Begbies Traynor Administrators of Torquay United.

Discuss everything TUFC with fans across the globe.
culmstockgull
Top Scorer
Top Scorer
Posts: 1142
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 20:09
Favourite player: stubbs
Location: uffculme
Watches from: Family Stand

Post by culmstockgull »

exilegull wrote: 22 May 2024, 15:12 There doesn't seem to be anything unusual about the football creditors and nothing to suggest these weren't paid on time up to the point the club announced the intention to enter administration at which point payment to creditors will generally stop and then simply accrue. Same with utilities and inland revenue, the amounts don't suggest any build of unpaid amounts prior to the plug being pulled.
140K to inland revenue doesnt suggest a bill accrued since we went into administration, its not so much the rationale behind sorting out creditors its the costs themselves, I would love to know from the bistro how they allowed the club to run up a £2900 bill or was that just a boozy lunch for the directors paid for by the club. .
AdrianC
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 109
Joined: 05 Jul 2023, 13:39
Favourite player: Chris Myers
Watches from: Pop side

Post by AdrianC »

Apologies if anyone has mentioned this in any posts which I’ve missed but reading those accounts it’s not just the fans and local population of Torbay that the club needs to re-engage with it’s the (local) businesses who have been left dangling!

I wonder if under the terms of the CVA we could offer advertising / sponsorship as a means of repayment? E.g. we owe ABC Ltd £2,000, would they accept a half way line advertising board for the season?

Just thinking of ways to maximise cash flow.
Dave
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7580
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 07:57
Location: Newton abbot

Post by Dave »

The Bryn consortium offered for all creditors to be paid in full within 6 months of the takeover, can't see the need to complicate matters.
Formerly known as forevertufc
exilegull
Vice Captain
Vice Captain
Posts: 529
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:01

Post by exilegull »

culmstockgull wrote: 22 May 2024, 15:39 140K to inland revenue doesnt suggest a bill accrued since we went into administration, its not so much the rationale behind sorting out creditors its the costs themselves, I would love to know from the bistro how they allowed the club to run up a £2900 bill or was that just a boozy lunch for the directors paid for by the club. .
Usual year end position owing to HMRC is around 100k, so 140k is effectively not a substantial amount more than the usual amount.

£2900 bill payable by account would suggest its for a regular ongoing service - Gary Johnson's fish suppers?

There will always be odd things in these accounts, but nothing in there screams out extravagance or neglect prior to administration.
Last edited by exilegull on 22 May 2024, 16:12, edited 1 time in total.
exilegull
Vice Captain
Vice Captain
Posts: 529
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:01

Post by exilegull »

Dave wrote: 22 May 2024, 16:06 The Bryn consortium offered for all creditors to be paid in full within 6 months of the takeover, can't see the need to complicate matters.
Presumably season ticket sales are generating significant cashflow in the period.
wbw
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 127
Joined: 21 Sep 2015, 10:50
Favourite player: Robin Stubbs

Post by wbw »

culmstockgull wrote: 22 May 2024, 14:29 The list of outstanding creditors just shows how badly the club was being run and running costs were not only out of control but there was no control, £2900 to a bistro in paignton ( perhaps someone could explain that one), £990 pounds to an embroidery service ( perhaps as part of his ludicrous contract johnson had to have his initials embroidered on his pyjames), 7000 to a accountants company in newton abbot( I thought thats what we had mel Hayman for) over 140K to the inland revenue, water and electricity that havent been paid for goodness knows how long and certainly long before feburary when osborne pulled the plug. Many thousands owed to clubs we took loan players from like colchester and fleetwood, small outfits like ourselves that need every pound that is owed to them, I am surprised with our track record anyone will loan us a player. Torquay United wasnt being run on any business model that I understand but by people who realised these costs could never be paid but continued spending anyway.
To be fair, there is very little in there that suggests a poorly run or extravagant club.
To take a couple of examples;
Limited companies have to use the services of an external independent auditor to submit their annual accounts.
Who did you think does the badge work on shirts for own use and resale to supporters?
HMRC amount is not huge in terms of months, maybe 2 months at most.
Football club creditors are what you would expect. Very few, if any, club to club payments are made up front. Most are scheduled over a season.
Electricity costs for floodlights are horrendous, so don't think that amount is particularly excessive.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of Osborne’s tenure, the club was certainly not being run in a way that couldn't be covered by his cash injections, until the plug was pulled.
brucie
Top Shirt Seller
Top Shirt Seller
Posts: 4650
Joined: 06 Sep 2010, 17:51

Post by brucie »

But it wasnt his money was it
User avatar
Southampton Gull
TorquayFans Admin
TorquayFans Admin
Posts: 7771
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 01:35
Location: Southampton

Post by Southampton Gull »

wbw wrote: 22 May 2024, 17:03 To be fair, there is very little in there that suggests a poorly run or extravagant club.
To take a couple of examples;
Limited companies have to use the services of an external independent auditor to submit their annual accounts.
Who did you think does the badge work on shirts for own use and resale to supporters?
HMRC amount is not huge in terms of months, maybe 2 months at most.
Football club creditors are what you would expect. Very few, if any, club to club payments are made up front. Most are scheduled over a season.
Electricity costs for floodlights are horrendous, so don't think that amount is particularly excessive.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of Osborne’s tenure, the club was certainly not being run in a way that couldn't be covered by his cash injections, until the plug was pulled.
Losses averaging £20k/week suggest you're talking your usual nonsense. Thank God the accountant has left the building 🙏
Dave




Friend of TorquayFans.com
wbw
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 127
Joined: 21 Sep 2015, 10:50
Favourite player: Robin Stubbs

Post by wbw »

Strange isn't it? 3 or 4 other posters make similar observations regarding the creditors list, none of which do you chose respond to.
bobbytanz1963
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 95
Joined: 30 Aug 2021, 19:02
Favourite player: Alex Russell
Location: Hemyock
Watches from: Bristow’s Bench

Post by bobbytanz1963 »

Southampton Gull wrote: 22 May 2024, 20:03 Losses averaging £20k/week suggest you're talking your usual nonsense. Thank God the accountant has left the building 🙏
The club had an accountant ? Next you will be saying there was a club secretary who monitored emails !!
User avatar
Southampton Gull
TorquayFans Admin
TorquayFans Admin
Posts: 7771
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 01:35
Location: Southampton

Post by Southampton Gull »

wbw wrote: 22 May 2024, 21:17 Strange isn't it? 3 or 4 other posters make similar observations regarding the creditors list, none of which do you chose respond to.
Nothing strange about it at all. Yours was the only one spouting nonsense 👍
Dave




Friend of TorquayFans.com
User avatar
Southampton Gull
TorquayFans Admin
TorquayFans Admin
Posts: 7771
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 01:35
Location: Southampton

Post by Southampton Gull »

bobbytanz1963 wrote: 22 May 2024, 21:48 The club had an accountant ? Next you will be saying there was a club secretary who monitored emails !!
Albeit an incompetent one so an incompetent secretary shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone 😉
Dave




Friend of TorquayFans.com
wbw
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 127
Joined: 21 Sep 2015, 10:50
Favourite player: Robin Stubbs

Post by wbw »

exilegull wrote: 22 May 2024, 15:12 There doesn't seem to be anything unusual about the football creditors and nothing to suggest these weren't paid on time up to the point the club announced the intention to enter administration at which point payment to creditors will generally stop and then simply accrue. Same with utilities and inland revenue, the amounts don't suggest any build of unpaid amounts prior to the plug being pulled.
:goodpost:
UnitedinDevon
Hat Trick Hero
Hat Trick Hero
Posts: 946
Joined: 26 Jan 2021, 18:13

Post by UnitedinDevon »

wbw wrote: 22 May 2024, 21:17 Strange isn't it? 3 or 4 other posters make similar observations regarding the creditors list, none of which do you chose respond to.
because yours was drivel
exilegull
Vice Captain
Vice Captain
Posts: 529
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:01

Post by exilegull »

Accountants account for the figures and prepare the financial statements, they don’t set the budgets and make the spending decisions, the board of directors and management do that.

This should be taken in no way as a defence of Osborne, that is absolutely not the purpose - but there remains very little evidence that on the non-footballing side, there was any substantial extravagance. So the losses of 20k a week mostly came from having a playing budget well in excess of the capacity of the club.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gulliball, United62 and 178 guests