by ferrarilover » 14 Jan 2011, 13:17
Hmmm, ok, they're a division apart, but I would suggest that Crawley beating us reprersents more of a giant killing than Southampton (a Premier League club in all but name) beating a disinterested Man Utd reserve side.
As for Chelsea, so they're the holders, really, who cares if they get knocked out, especially by another, fairly good Premier League side?
The argument can be made that Fulham v Spurs is worthy of a place on TV, but then, we can see them play each other twice a season, every season, what we can't see on TV twice a year is TUFC v Crawley Town. Nor Arsenal (or Leeds) v Huddersfield, which arguably makes it the most worthy of the ties which will be or have already been chosen.
I'm not naive, I know that the TV companies have extortionate salaries to pay their top execs and, as such, they must maximise income from advertising during these games and, as such, Man Utd are a better team to broadcast (because, let's be honest, idiots would tune in to watch a dog have a shit if the dog was wearing a Man Utd shirt) than TUFC, but money and advertising revenue are precisely the kinds of things which the FA Cup should not, and never used to, represent.
Football was (and perhaps still is at our level and below) the people's game. Sadly, money hungry businessmen have been allowed to pervade our game and are systematically ruining it with their trillion pound take over deals and unsustainable wages. I will laugh like a drain the day the Premier League has to shut down because people steadfastly refuse to pay £1000 for a back seat at Old Trafford, simply because this is the only way Malcolm Glazer can afford to pay Wayne Rooney Jr £1,000,000,000 a week.
No, don't give me all that nonsense, it's not jealousy because these guys earn a fortune, I have all the cash I need thanks and more besides, it's these 'get-rich(er)-quick owners who will pay with their fortunes, and it can't come a day too soon.
Matt.
(Sorry, got a bit carried away)
Hmmm, ok, they're a division apart, but I would suggest that Crawley beating us reprersents more of a giant killing than Southampton (a Premier League club in all but name) beating a disinterested Man Utd reserve side.
As for Chelsea, so they're the holders, really, who cares if they get knocked out, especially by another, fairly good Premier League side?
The argument can be made that Fulham v Spurs is worthy of a place on TV, but then, we can see them play each other twice a season, every season, what we can't see on TV twice a year is TUFC v Crawley Town. Nor Arsenal (or Leeds) v Huddersfield, which arguably makes it the most worthy of the ties which will be or have already been chosen.
I'm not naive, I know that the TV companies have extortionate salaries to pay their top execs and, as such, they must maximise income from advertising during these games and, as such, Man Utd are a better team to broadcast (because, let's be honest, idiots would tune in to watch a dog have a shit if the dog was wearing a Man Utd shirt) than TUFC, but money and advertising revenue are precisely the kinds of things which the FA Cup should not, and never used to, represent.
Football was (and perhaps still is at our level and below) the people's game. Sadly, money hungry businessmen have been allowed to pervade our game and are systematically ruining it with their trillion pound take over deals and unsustainable wages. I will laugh like a drain the day the Premier League has to shut down because people steadfastly refuse to pay £1000 for a back seat at Old Trafford, simply because this is the only way Malcolm Glazer can afford to pay Wayne Rooney Jr £1,000,000,000 a week.
No, don't give me all that nonsense, it's not jealousy because these guys earn a fortune, I have all the cash I need thanks and more besides, it's these 'get-rich(er)-quick owners who will pay with their fortunes, and it can't come a day too soon.
Matt.
(Sorry, got a bit carried away)