Hawley and Ball confirmed...

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by Gullscorer » 01 Aug 2013, 23:34

ferrarilover wrote:Actually, you're right. Well, partially. I feel dodgy lawyers is a tautology.

Matt.
Matt, if you mean a tautology because lawyers are, by definition, dodgy, then actually you're right. Well, partially. Some are dodgy in the sense of being unreliable due to being inadequate in their work, for example, by unwisely taking on work which is beyond their level of skill or area of expertise. Others, much more rarely, are dodgy because they're prone to using underhand or even illegal or criminal tactics. Fortunately 99% of lawyers produce perfectly reasonable work. A few are quite brilliant.

But the big problem I have with lawyers is the rip-off fees they charge. In this respect they are almost as bad as, for example, vets, private dentists and surveyors. Plumbers and builders too. It is said that we don't pay such people for the job they do, but we pay them for knowing how to do the job. Yet any moderately intelligent person, with a little diligent autodidactic research, could learn how to do a quite adequate job for next to no cost, apart from a certain amount of time and effort. But if, after that, you still needed to hire an expert, you'd at least have a better chance of knowing if that expert was trying to pull the wool over your eyes in order to hide his or her inadequacy, or, indeed, was trying to rip you off..

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by ferrarilover » 01 Aug 2013, 20:25

Actually, you're right. Well, partially. I feel dodge lawyers is a tautology.

Matt.

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by Gullscorer » 01 Aug 2013, 19:56

ferrarilover wrote:Well thank you very much. :~D

Matt.
Sounds more like a firm of dodgy lawyers... :whistle:

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by ferrarilover » 01 Aug 2013, 15:55

Well thank you very much. :~D

Matt.

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by exilegull » 01 Aug 2013, 15:52

ferrarilover wrote:Anyone else think 'Hawley & Ball' sounds like a Saville Row shirt company?

Matt.

No (£)

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by ferrarilover » 01 Aug 2013, 15:48

Anyone else think 'Hawley & Ball' sounds like a Saville Row shirt company?

Matt.

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by Fonda » 01 Aug 2013, 15:30

Have they got squad numbers yet? Hawley should be 10 really... ;-)

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by Richinns » 01 Aug 2013, 15:17

exilegull wrote: Sorry must have missed the other thread. No, neither of these names mentioned - Stockley and the lad Smith from Charlton who went to Wimbledon were mentioned. I think we were still expecting Stockley. We were also enquiring after Benson and it seems Showunmi may have been available.
Thanks exile
Benson aside I think we have done better than those mentioned here. Stockley is a possibility if Ball goes back in two months I would think.

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by exilegull » 01 Aug 2013, 15:06

Richinns wrote: Hi exile

I asked (rather clumsily in another thread!!) if these were 2 of the 4 Knill talked to at the open day?
Sorry must have missed the other thread. No, neither of these names mentioned - Stockley and the lad Smith from Charlton who went to Wimbledon were mentioned. I think we were still expecting Stockley. We were also enquiring after Benson and it seems Showunmi may have been available.

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by Richinns » 01 Aug 2013, 14:57

exilegull wrote:Delighted - two more quality signings. Hawley is still only 31 and coming off the back of a decent season in a struggling side in league 1.

Can't wait until Saturday.
Hi exile

I asked (rather clumsily in another thread!!) if these were 2 of the 4 Knill talked to at the open day?

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by bc-gull » 01 Aug 2013, 14:54

after these two signings im not convinced that benyon may be a first teamer! he will start on saturday for obvious reasons but i can see these two new signings doing a lot more in a striker partnership than any other pair

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by Jeff » 01 Aug 2013, 14:48

Got to be honest - I was a bit underwhelmed at first at the thought of Hawley as I always had in my head he'd had a couple of good seasons at Carlisle but other than that had struggled elsewhere. But he had a much better season at Scunthorpe than I realised, which suggests he could do the business at this level.

Ball sounds a great acquisition. And we have a nice blend of the big target man plus smaller players to play off him. Gives us 3 or 4 different selections we can use depending on the scenario.

Top work AK!

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by exilegull » 01 Aug 2013, 14:28

Delighted - two more quality signings. Hawley is still only 31 and coming off the back of a decent season in a struggling side in league 1.

Can't wait until Saturday.

Re: Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by SuperNickyWroe » 01 Aug 2013, 14:28

Gullscorer wrote:Handshakes should be banned. They're a silly stupid custom.

Rubbing noses is better. :)
wusses.

in the barnsley sunday league, headbutts were acceptable.
it certainly put a marker down....... =D

Hawley and Ball confirmed...

by gullno4 » 01 Aug 2013, 14:26

excellent signings, could be a very good game on Saturday!

Top