Nathan Craig

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Nathan Craig

Re: Nathan Craig

by Colorado Gull » 03 Sep 2013, 13:12

ggggg wrote:none of you know what's going on, it's really funny knowing what's happening when you lot blatantly haven't got a scooby! this is the last place on earth I would bother sharing information due to the nature of this forum and the way it's run! as for the 2 signings that are due today meh!

ggggg, seeing as you have such a bad view on this very well run and family forum, I suggest you give us the pleasure of not seeing your posts which lack any sort of coming together and joining in with the debate.

With the use of 'meh' on a forum like this and the username with no sense of variety other than 5 of the same letter, seems as if you are in the wrong place.

Re: Nathan Craig

by chunkygull » 02 Sep 2013, 15:23

tomogull wrote:Just for the record, personally I think the Forum is very well run and am grateful to those who spend time keeping it ticking over okay - thanks. It's great for all ages and walks of life to share their different viewpoints
:goodpost:

just to add to that, and say i agree 100% and would like to express thanks and gratitude to all involved. :clap: :bow: .

i really enjoy this forum, in fact i bloody loves it.

Re: Nathan Craig

by tomogull » 02 Sep 2013, 14:55

Just for the record, personally I think the Forum is very well run and am grateful to those who spend time keeping it ticking over okay - thanks. It's great for all ages and walks of life to share their different viewpoints

Nathan Craig

by Southampton Gull » 02 Sep 2013, 13:55

It was always going to end in tears with someone who chooses to use an emnail address that starts with tnuc@ ........................

I think Dave and Rich have him described perfectly.

Re: Nathan Craig

by Scott Brehaut » 02 Sep 2013, 10:32

ggggg wrote:none of you know what's going on, it's really funny knowing what's happening when you lot blatantly haven't got a scooby! this is the last place on earth I would bother sharing information due to the nature of this forum and the way it's run! as for the 2 signings that are due today meh!
As you clearly dislike the way the site is run, maybe we should just prevent you from posting on the site - makes it easier for you then.

As for your "inside information", there are plenty of other posters on here that are glad to share the info - and two of them are very close to the club.

The reason you dislike the way the site is run is because of your inability to post correctly on here, and you wild accusations of over moderation - even when it was proven to you that none of your posts (bar one that you were informed of) were removed.

So, off you run now - its no loss to the majority of us on here....I'm sure school starts this week for you, so at least there will be something for you to do..........

Re: Nathan Craig

by Richinns » 02 Sep 2013, 09:37

ggggg wrote: BELL END ALERT

I've just said it, that's where! meh!
so if you don't like someone or what they post they must be a troll! well the same applies to bell ends then, two can play that game!
Hahaha - you are a very angry man!

Not good at any IT skills or interaction with others it would seem!

I genuinely feel sorry for you as you must be very lonely. You don't like the site or those who run or post on here yet you remain to post your rather aggressive and nasty posts to hit out at those who do enjoy it here.

Have a long look at this and what does this say about you?

Sad, very sad.

Re: Nathan Craig

by Dave » 02 Sep 2013, 09:33

Geezer, ggggg. Why don't you do yourself a huge favour and move on from this site (the content on here seems to make you very angry), you are displaying all the classic signs of a self harmer.

Re: Nathan Craig

by Yellow4life » 02 Sep 2013, 09:22

ggggg wrote:none of you know what's going on, it's really funny knowing what's happening when you lot blatantly haven't got a scooby!
I wouldn't actually want to know everything what was happening with the club all the time, that would just be boring. This way everyone on the forum can discuss and try and work out what may happen- much more appealing when you support a club.

Re: Nathan Craig

by ggggg » 02 Sep 2013, 09:10

Richinns wrote: TROLL ALERT

and where has anyone said about us making 2 signing today? have I missed this somewhere?
BELL END ALERT

I've just said it, that's where! meh!
so if you don't like someone or what they post they must be a troll! well the same applies to bell ends then, two can play that game!

Re: Nathan Craig

by Richinns » 02 Sep 2013, 08:39

ggggg wrote:none of you know what's going on, it's really funny knowing what's happening when you lot blatantly haven't got a scooby! this is the last place on earth I would bother sharing information due to the nature of this forum and the way it's run! as for the 2 signings that are due today meh!
TROLL ALERT

and where has anyone said about us making 2 signing today? have I missed this somewhere?

Re: Nathan Craig

by ggggg » 02 Sep 2013, 08:32

none of you know what's going on, it's really funny knowing what's happening when you lot blatantly haven't got a scooby! this is the last place on earth I would bother sharing information due to the nature of this forum and the way it's run! as for the 2 signings that are due today meh!

Nathan Craig

by PhilGull » 02 Sep 2013, 07:54

Sadly I don't think we are ever going to see Craig in the middle while Knill is in charge. He is a very old fashioned English manager. It's all about pace out wide and the big man/little man combo up front. The middle of the park if for defending, not being creative.
If Craig was to play in the middle it would be best with Lathrope sitting in behind him and someone more like Jarvis on one wing to provide a little more cover. While we have quick but defensively deficient wide attackers we are not going to see Craig in the middle.
It simply isn't Knill's way.

Re: Nathan Craig

by Sunnysideup » 01 Sep 2013, 22:01

forevertufc wrote:Thing is yesterday, we had no problem creating goalscoring chances, should have won that game by 3 or more. So is midfield/team formation really that much of a problem?
Exactly my thought (though I would also add the balls in from the flanks were pretty shocking all game). Central midfield wasnt the problem yesterday, it was the inability to finish and the inability to cross (reasonably) accurately.

Nathan Craig

by brucie » 01 Sep 2013, 21:20

No the problem is obvious - the strikers are not scoring goals

Re: Nathan Craig

by Dave » 01 Sep 2013, 21:01

Thing is yesterday, we had no problem creating goalscoring chances, should have won that game by 3 or more. So is midfield/team formation really that much of a problem?

Top