Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by SuperNickyWroe » 13 Jan 2014, 13:37

seems like Jesus was happy............. :clap:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25712135

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Sunnysideup » 10 Jan 2014, 18:54

Im sure we all have differing criteria as to what constitutes a club legend and you would get as many definitions as there are football clubs.

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by PhilGull » 10 Jan 2014, 11:22

Sunnysideup wrote: Though Carl F started at Ballmouth, you're probably thinking of Steve F who is a legend there...Something like 600 appearances over 20 years and even a stand named after him...
I think this would qualify Carl Fletcher as a Bournemouth legend

"Fletcher started his career at Football League club Bournemouth, making his debut in February 1998 as a 17 year-old. He made 185 league starts for the south-coast club, including captaining the side to a 5–2 victory over Lincoln City in the 2003 Division 3 playoff final and scoring 2 of the goals himself, before earning a move to West Ham United in 2004 for £275,000."

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Sunnysideup » 10 Jan 2014, 10:15

Gullscorer wrote:Yep. Fletcher was a favourite at Bournemouth as a player.
Though Carl F started at Ballmouth, you're probably thinking of Steve F who is a legend there...Something like 600 appearances over 20 years and even a stand named after him...

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Gullscorer » 10 Jan 2014, 09:10

Neal wrote:Who knows if its the right choice.
If he keeps us up yes
If we go down and we come up in the 1st or 2nd season yes.
If we go down to conf then have a relegation battle to stay out of conf south or get releagated to conf south then no
Isn't hindsight wonderful.. :)

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Neal » 10 Jan 2014, 08:31

Who knows if its the right choice.

If he keeps us up yes
If we go down and we come up in the 1st or 2nd season yes.
If we go down to conf then have a relegation battle to stay out of conf south or get releagated to conf south then no

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Gullscorer » 10 Jan 2014, 00:21

ferrarilover wrote:Carl Fletcher, ex-Plymouth boss?
Matt.
Yep. Fletcher was a favourite at Bournemouth as a player.

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by ferrarilover » 10 Jan 2014, 00:18

Carl Fletcher, ex-Plymouth boss?

Matt.

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Gullscorer » 10 Jan 2014, 00:16

Carl Fletcher, having left Barnet, is rumoured to be joining Bournemouth, but it's unclear whether he will be youth team coach or whether he will replace Chris Hargreaves as first team coach; Eddie Howe is still apparently undecided as to whether he will replace Hargreaves.

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by PhilGull » 09 Jan 2014, 12:54

Gullscorer wrote:We ought to have a link to the BBC interview with Chris Hargreaves here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25642828
Even more positive now, think I may be developing a full-blown man-crush on the new gaffer!

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Gullscorer » 09 Jan 2014, 09:11

We ought to have a link to the BBC interview with Chris Hargreaves here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25642828

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by vinny » 07 Jan 2014, 22:42

With regards to the press conference it was good to see Alex Rowe back in the limelight again. He speaks well, assertively and confidently. Hopefully he doesnt disappear into the shadows again.

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by Fonda » 07 Jan 2014, 22:40

'He loves Torquay'. And there you have it. He's obviously the right man for the job on the basis of that alone.

My post was light-hearted. There was certainly no anger or 'vitriol', and anyone who thinks there was doesn't understand the meaning of the word.

I wish him well, and am inspired enough myself to purchase a half-season ticket. But it doesn't change my opinion that he was always the 'obvious' (THAT'S NOT TO SAY WRONG) choice.

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by lucy6lucy » 07 Jan 2014, 21:59

AustrianAntheaGull wrote:Such 'vitriol' knocking about on here about the board and the suitability of Hargreaves before a ball has even been kicked.

The board appointed Knill on the basis that he kept us up last season, was prepared to show his commitment by moving his family down and also because he was an experienced league manager. I would say that the majority of the fanbase were not necessarily happy with his appointment but believed that the football couldn't be any worse than under Ling, so they (I) went along with it with the expectation of probably mid table but some good attacking positive football. We didn't get any of what we expected and were badly let down. By Knill NOT the board. They could be accused of not conducting a proper interview process and taking the easy option but just how could they and us have known just how incompetent and unsuitable for the job Knill would turn out to be? Blaming them for Knill is idiocy just like doing so for the Hargreaves appointment.

Hargreaves is a rookie but if he brings renewed energy and vigour to the club and playing staff then we will stay up. I believe in this league he will be able to negate his lack of managerial experience with just getting us to play like we're a non league side in a cup tie. We'll get enough points to stay up IMO. A lot of our players are crap and a lot are good so if he can get the best out of the crap ones to make them ordinary and get the best out of the good ones to make them very good then we're in business.

What was the alternative? Appoint another 'been there, seen it, done it and got the t-shirt' manager who goes through the motions and doesn't either give a sh*t nor need the cash or motivation to do well? It's a big risk taking Hargreaves on but I honestly don't believe anybody else other than perhaps Martin Allen could come in and guide us to safety. We were going down anyway under Knill and the board have acted in good time to give us a fighting chance and so anyone castigating their decision for bringing in Hargreaves is a silly billy.

If we go down the board are absolved of any culpability in my opinion as they have done the right thing on 3 separate occasions already this season. Appointing Knill, sacking Knill and appointing Hargreaves. Relegation will be mainly the fault of Knill and some the fault of Hargreaves. Hargreaves is now a full time professional football manager and even though he has no experience he has convinced the board and the majority of fans that he has what it takes to get us out of a hole and so we must trust him. Failure will not exempt him from blame, he has been given a chance that only 91 other blokes have at any one time. To manage a football league club.

I trust him and I trust the board despite me criticising their lack of communication with fans at times. The board have done what is required in all these tricky circumstances including with Ling and people still have a dig. Unbelievable.

Nice one Andy. We have got our man . Remember him running onto the pitch with the trophy after we got promoted whilst everyone else was still in the stands, he loves torquay

Greavsie and Lee Hodges it is then ...

by tomogull » 07 Jan 2014, 21:56

Fonda wrote:Don't agree with the first part. He's incredibly popular, and if he takes us down the blame would be given to his predecessor.

And I'm not sure what you'd expect his previous employers to say if asked? 'Yeah, we're pretty glad to see the back of his if I'm honest...?'
Fonda - if we go down (and of course we all sincerely hope we won't) Knill would quite rightly take the lion's share of the blame for landing us in this mess in the first place, regardless of who was appointed as his successor. At the time, I had no arguments with Knill's appointment but it has turned out to be a complete disaster. He brought decent players to the club, most of them loanees, but he didn't seem to have the slightest idea how to mould them into a team of players.

Top