BILL PHILLIPS ?

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: BILL PHILLIPS ?

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by Rjc70 » 30 Apr 2014, 22:50

Devon Yellow's post seemed to collate most of the empirical data.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by AustrianAndyGull » 30 Apr 2014, 20:35

pansy, daft apeth, noddy, barnpot or knobsack.

Not sure the last one is legit but it sounds Yorkshire.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by SuperNickyWroe » 30 Apr 2014, 20:34

Jerry wrote: IT problems in Barnsley? :|

i refer the right honourable gentleman to the above post.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by SuperNickyWroe » 30 Apr 2014, 20:33

Alpine Joe wrote:SuperNickyWroe

I would have expected a 'me old flower' in the Charlie Williams style, but 'sunshine' is almost as good. Having spent a fair bit of time defending those supposedly gullible Yorkshire folk who we'd just been told are incapable of having an opinion unless Nigel Farage makes it for them, I'm a little surprised on which side of the fence some northerners have decided to sit ( no I'm not really ;-)) .

I'd normally love to do you a favour SNW, but considering it was back on the 28th that jerry asked you a question on this thread, I assume you've been working on some epic reply for the last two days, so I'll certainly be going nowhere just in case I miss it.
oh, that was directed at me?

thats the problem when there are more than one "supes" on the forum.

hope that clears it up why i didnt reply me old cock.

or flower.

or duck.

whichever yorkshire phrase tha fancies.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by AustrianAndyGull » 30 Apr 2014, 19:12

Jerry wrote: IT problems in Barnsley? :|
Aye, that an' all t'rest! :rofl:

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by Jerry » 30 Apr 2014, 19:02

Alpine Joe wrote:
I'd normally love to do you a favour SNW, but considering it was back on the 28th that jerry asked you a question on this thread, I assume you've been working on some epic reply for the last two days, so I'll certainly be going nowhere just in case I miss it.
IT problems in Barnsley? :|

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by stefano » 30 Apr 2014, 18:41

Alpine Joe wrote:SuperNickyWroe

I would have expected a 'me old flower' in the Charlie Williams style, but 'sunshine' is almost as good. Having spent a fair bit of time defending those supposedly gullible Yorkshire folk who we'd just been told are incapable of having an opinion unless Nigel Farage makes it for them, I'm a little surprised on which side of the fence some northerners have decided to sit ( no I'm not really ;-)) .

I'd normally love to do you a favour SNW, but considering it was back on the 28th that jerry asked you a question on this thread, I assume you've been working on some epic reply for the last two days, so I'll certainly be going nowhere just in case I miss it.
:goodpost: :rofl:

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by Alpine Joe » 30 Apr 2014, 18:38

SuperNickyWroe
do me a favour and do one sunshine.


I would have expected a 'me old flower' in the Charlie Williams style, but 'sunshine' is almost as good. Having spent a fair bit of time defending those supposedly gullible Yorkshire folk who we'd just been told are incapable of having an opinion unless Nigel Farage makes it for them, I'm a little surprised on which side of the fence some northerners have decided to sit ( no I'm not really ;-)) .

I'd normally love to do you a favour SNW, but considering it was back on the 28th that jerry asked you a question on this thread, I assume you've been working on some epic reply for the last two days, so I'll certainly be going nowhere just in case I miss it.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by arcadia » 30 Apr 2014, 17:29

SuperNickyWroe wrote: do me a favour and do one sunshine.
:goodpost:

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by AustrianAndyGull » 30 Apr 2014, 17:12

:clap: :rofl:

Classic!

Maybe it's the 'gullible' Yorkshire simpletons who are in fact right about a lot of things and the folk who have been over educated to within an inch of their life are over-complicating things to such an extent that they are in fact wrong but cannot see past their own 'intelligence'? :~D

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by SuperNickyWroe » 30 Apr 2014, 15:53

Alpine Joe wrote:Matt Doesn't it beg the question as to why these people get there opinions from this particular politician, who frankly until the last year or two was given little chance to speak at length on main stream media ? and not from the BBC who absolutely dominate media in this country, or from numerous other publications other than the Mail, or why they are not influenced by the various Soap Operas broadcast for hours every night that all portray a positive view of immigrants, or the films which almost without exception are quick to parody the bigot who hasn't welcomed inclusiveness with open arms ?

Did things really develop in the order that Matt tells us, or was it really the other way around ? Was it not because of the opinions of these people, and the way they have voted in increasing numbers that has brought Farage and his party to the fore ? Has the rise of Farage really had nothing to do with reflecting opinion and everything to do with creating it ?

None of 'those people' have been disadvantaged, and neither have any of us even been as much as inconvenienced by one single immigrant! Again, I wonder if Matt's assertion really is true. Would none of those people have found it more difficult to get a Doctors appointment in their part of Leeds, Bradford or Sheffield since the big increase in patients that many GP's have on their rota when local populations increase rapidly. Did none of them think that their grandchild was being disadvantaged by the overcrowded primary school they were now having to attend and the amount of teaching time that is being devoted to children for whom English is still almost a foreign language.

Even if Matt had the power to stop the Daily Mail reporting these things, the facts on the ground wouldn't go away. Even if we look at the more minor things from today such as 'Subway removes ham and bacon from nearly 200 stores and offers halal meat only after 'strong demand' from Muslims' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -meat.html I can't see why having your local Subway no longer being willing to provide your favourite ham or pork sandwiches because they've decided instead to cater to an ever growing immigrant population does not qualify as an inconvenience ?

Matt is of course right when he says there are plenty of English muggers about without paying special attention to those from Poland. But maybe those gullible Yorkshire people, who are told that our prisons are bursting at the seams, think the situation would be improved without the eleven thousand Poles who are in British prisons, none of whom can be sent back until Poland has built enough prisons to cope with the number of criminals they have. 'Under a deal agreed by the last Labour government, no Polish inmates will have to serve their sentences back home until at least December 2016 to give the country time to build new jails.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... maica.html


Matt's sweeping statements always make good and enjoyable reading, but remember to ask yourself whether it's all as straight forward as he's telling you it is, or whether it deserves a little bit of scrutiny.
do me a favour and do one sunshine.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by Alpine Joe » 30 Apr 2014, 15:36

Matt
These people get their "opinions" from that Farage prat and his daft newspaper cronies at the Daily Wail, then simple regurgitate them as their own, reasoned, evidenced, researched opinions, without ever thinking where the information came from and what the agenda of the people selling it might be. I'd dearly love to ask any of them if they can think of a time in the last, say, year, when they have been disadvantaged, in any way, by an "immigrant". The answer, of course, is that they haven't, and nor have I and nor have you, because "immigrants" don't actually inconvenience or harm us in any way.
Doesn't it beg the question as to why these people get there opinions from this particular politician, who frankly until the last year or two was given little chance to speak at length on main stream media ? and not from the BBC who absolutely dominate media in this country, or from numerous other publications other than the Mail, or why they are not influenced by the various Soap Operas broadcast for hours every night that all portray a positive view of immigrants, or the films which almost without exception are quick to parody the bigot who hasn't welcomed inclusiveness with open arms ?

Did things really develop in the order that Matt tells us, or was it really the other way around ? Was it not because of the opinions of these people, and the way they have voted in increasing numbers that has brought Farage and his party to the fore ? Has the rise of Farage really had nothing to do with reflecting opinion and everything to do with creating it ?

None of 'those people' have been disadvantaged, and neither have any of us even been as much as inconvenienced by one single immigrant! Again, I wonder if Matt's assertion really is true. Would none of those people have found it more difficult to get a Doctors appointment in their part of Leeds, Bradford or Sheffield since the big increase in patients that many GP's have on their rota when local populations increase rapidly. Did none of them think that their grandchild was being disadvantaged by the overcrowded primary school they were now having to attend and the amount of teaching time that is being devoted to children for whom English is still almost a foreign language.

Even if Matt had the power to stop the Daily Mail reporting these things, the facts on the ground wouldn't go away. Even if we look at the more minor things from today such as 'Subway removes ham and bacon from nearly 200 stores and offers halal meat only after 'strong demand' from Muslims' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -meat.html I can't see why having your local Subway no longer being willing to provide your favourite ham or pork sandwiches because they've decided instead to cater to an ever growing immigrant population does not qualify as an inconvenience ?

Matt is of course right when he says there are plenty of English muggers about without paying special attention to those from Poland. But maybe those gullible Yorkshire people, who are told that our prisons are bursting at the seams, think the situation would be improved without the eleven thousand Poles who are in British prisons, none of whom can be sent back until Poland has built enough prisons to cope with the number of criminals they have. 'Under a deal agreed by the last Labour government, no Polish inmates will have to serve their sentences back home until at least December 2016 to give the country time to build new jails.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... maica.html


Matt's sweeping statements always make good and enjoyable reading, but remember to ask yourself whether it's all as straight forward as he's telling you it is, or whether it deserves a little bit of scrutiny.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by Gullscorer » 30 Apr 2014, 14:31

We should move to the Popside Forum now, Matt, to discuss Farage and UKIP, since you appear to have succumbed to the same 'evidence by citation' problem as those who mistakenly conflate the issues of immigration with those of race. People may make connections between the two, but they are actually different issues.

Anyway, back to the topic, and your opinion of Bill Phillips. Evidence to back it up, please?

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by ferrarilover » 30 Apr 2014, 13:02

Gullscorer wrote:Mark Twain once said: 'In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the question at issue, but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.'

The same could be said of any area of life. If people repeat other people's opinions or gossip or misconceptions (or even lies) often enough, they will eventually be accepted as fact. It happens in Academia too. It's called 'evidence by citation'.. :-|
Not often you and I agree on non-football matters, but this one gets my goat too. As you'd imagine, I spend a lot of my time telling other people what other people think based on what I've been told by the first group of people, who themselves have based their information to share with me on the very opinions which I am quoting back to them. Now, I'll concede, I do get to quote some fabulously intelligent and well read people, whose opinions are probably worth listening to. But for every one of them, there are at least half a dozen citations offered from "some **** or another" who happens to have written a journal article or newspaper column.
Drives me nuts that, effectively, Richard Littlejohn is liable to having his opinion quoted on my specialist subject (about which, like everything, he knows nothing), but I cannot offer my own insights (as valid and evidentially sound as they may be) because, with the greatest of respect, who the **** am I?

I had a relevant experience last night watching the BBC News at 10. They were in Yorkshire (not, as I'm sure you're aware, a county noted for being heaving full of the sorts of people of whom UKIP disapprove) and every single person they asked said they thought (we may already be pushing the bounds of credibility, but I'll let that slide) that immigration was too high. Cut to a wide angle scene of the large, public gathering at which they were all being interviewed, and guess what, not a non-white, non-English face amongst a crown of thousands.
These people get their "opinions" from that Farage prat and his daft newspaper cronies at the Daily Wail, then simple regurgitate them as their own, reasoned, evidenced, researched opinions, without ever thinking where the information came from and what the agenda of the people selling it might be. I'd dearly love to ask any of them if they can think of a time in the last, say, year, when they have been disadvantaged, in any way, by an "immigrant". The answer, of course, is that they haven't, and nor have I and nor have you, because "immigrants" don't actually inconvenience or harm us in any way. Certainly no way which is bespoke to them.
I'm sure Dave won't mind my sharing the story (so far as I understand it) of his recent run in with a couple of Polish chaps who tried to relieve him of his hard earned at a cash point (if memory serves). He shooed them off as you'd expect, but the Facebook comments which followed were, well, typical of Facebook, I'm afraid. As if there aren't many thousands of perfectly English muggers knocking about...

I deal with "immigrants" a lot. They cook me absolutely wonderful food at my local Indian, a couple of them work at the local drinks manufacturing factory near where I live. A couple of them play for my football team. When I go to London, they drive my buses and Tube trains and they serve my Costa Coffee and man the receptions at all the best hotels. They are also, mainly, the doctors and nurses who treated my when I was extremely sick However, who do I see in Plymouth when I spend time at the local Magistrates' Court? White people, English white people who have had every opportunity that you and I have enjoyed, rather than growing up in a hut in Romania, and have still ended up bobbing about at the bottom of the barrel. Immigrants causing all our problems? I'm very much afraid the fault lies much closer to home.

Anyway, sorry, what was I saying? Bill Phillips eh, what a cock!

Matt.

BILL PHILLIPS ?

by Gullscorer » 30 Apr 2014, 10:56

stefano wrote: That will make it fact then ;-)
Mark Twain once said: 'In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the question at issue, but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.'

The same could be said of any area of life. If people repeat other people's opinions or gossip or misconceptions (or even lies) often enough, they will eventually be accepted as fact. It happens in Academia too. It's called 'evidence by citation'.. :-|

Top