Four years old?! Clubs are really allowed to take on kids that young?
I wouldn't let a football club anywhere near my boy at that age, up until 10 or 11 they should be playing purely for fun, let kids be kids, they're not a product to be exploited by the Premier League. Sometimes I wonder why parents would sign their children up for these academies so young. Maybe to fulfil Daddy's unrealised childhood dream and set the family up for life.
The Premier League want to rip kids away from their parents, take away their chance at a childhood, then spit them out when they don't meet their requirements leaving the rest of the Football League to fight for scraps.
What happens when these kids don't get taken on by anyone? They've been trained to be footballers, presumably with the egos that go with it, will they be taught a skill at these schools as a back up? Probably not.
It's wrong to do this to children just so the big clubs can produce the next Beckham or Rooney. And for each new 'star' how many kids are going to be cruelly rejected after having spent up to twelve years of their lives in these academies?
Apart from what it does to children it's just another case of the Premier League saying to the 'little' clubs "we're bigger than you, we're richer than you, you'll do as you're told, get what you're given and be f***ing grateful".
![Angry :@](./images/smilies/grrrrrr.gif)