Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Trojan 67 » 15 Oct 2014, 20:58

Allowing for "unavailability" due to injury, suspension, loss of form and call up to International duty :rofl: , the squad needs a minimum of 4 central defenders. We got 'em : MacDonaldDucky, Downer, Pearce and blanked Jake. There will be more times this season when we are missing our first choice central defenders. Gawd f*cking help us. I always wondered what the "H" stood for in the exclamation "JESUS H CHRIST!"

After watching non action from Hargreaves during the Alfredtown disgrace, it now becomes apparent.

:-/

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by StretfordGull » 12 Oct 2014, 14:54

Yesterday was unquestionably the worst defensive display from a Torquay side that I have ever seen.
This is partly due to the fact we had a short midfielder in there, but also because Krystian Pearce was terrible. Absolutely terrible.
It seemed that every long ball caused sheer panic in the box. Hawley played really well off the shoulder and had a field day against Richards and their number 9 won practically every ball against Pearce. If we were playing a decent side, we would've conceded 10 goals.
Therefore, Pearce has to be dropped. You cannot perform that ineptly and keep your place.
Macdonald and Downes have to come back, regardless of how ill-disciplined they are.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Scott Brehaut » 12 Oct 2014, 14:14

I'd voted for Pearce and MacDonald as I deemed them to be "the future", in that they are both young and could be here for a while. However, based on the showing last night (and giving consideration to the fact that Pearce was pretty much playing by himself), Pearce didn't do anything to convince me he deserved to play again.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by YellowMurphy » 12 Oct 2014, 14:13

Sunnysideup wrote: Was he? In a team where no one (apart from Ricey, and Marquis maybe in the few games he was here?) performed well with any consistency, to say he was one of the "better" players isnt the same as him being "really good". He was just as capable as any of the other defenders at playing the ball to an opponent, missing headers, poor positioning etc etc
Was being sarcastic. MacDownes are the real deal, not sure what everyone sees in Pearce. The myth that he's better than Downes (or Mac for that matter) really does baffle me.

Get the feeling that if we'd have had Downes in the team we would've had somebody sorting the defence out, attacking the ball and preventing the flick ons which Alfreton profited from so easily.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Dave » 12 Oct 2014, 09:05

Had voted for Pearce/MacDonald, based on yesterday couldn't blame CH if he went right back to Downes/MacDonald.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Sunnysideup » 12 Oct 2014, 09:02

YellowMurphy wrote: But Pearce was really good last season and apparently that's all that matters?
Was he? In a team where no one (apart from Ricey, and Marquis maybe in the few games he was here?) performed well with any consistency, to say he was one of the "better" players isnt the same as him being "really good". He was just as capable as any of the other defenders at playing the ball to an opponent, missing headers, poor positioning etc etc

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Maxiboy1 » 12 Oct 2014, 02:05

No thanks RJC. Downes and Mac. FFS!

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Rjc70 » 12 Oct 2014, 01:28

What about the Courtney Richards and Luke Young centre back pairing option???? FFS.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Maxiboy1 » 12 Oct 2014, 01:14

After last night, it has to be Downes and Mac. First 2 goals for Alfreton, Pearce has to do better with the initial headers.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by YellowMurphy » 11 Oct 2014, 19:32

CP Gull wrote:Downes and MacDonald for me, regardless of any shortcomings, both play with a passion and desire to win that Pearce has failed to show since being given his chance this season. Not only that but Both, Downes in particular, are also such a threat at set pieces.
But Pearce was really good last season and apparently that's all that matters?

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by CP Gull » 11 Oct 2014, 18:56

Downes and MacDonald for me, regardless of any shortcomings, both play with a passion and desire to win that Pearce has failed to show since being given his chance this season. Not only that but both, Downes in particular, are also such a threat at set pieces.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by tomogull » 09 Oct 2014, 23:18

YellowMurphy wrote: But Pearce is a bit quicker! We must play him! Can you not remember last season when he was 'amazing'..?
As Philgull rightly posted earlier, Downes is a left-sided central defender. Both McDonald and Pearce are right-sided. It does make a difference and it showed at times last Saturday. As Arcadia has posted, Angus has grown into the role as leader and has been immense for us this season. It's really, really tough on whoever is left out but I feel CH should stick with the pairing that has done so well for us so far.

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by arcadia » 09 Oct 2014, 16:51

The best thing for Torquay is that McDonald has stepped up and been a leader, he's been outstanding.
Downes always struggles against someone who ruffs him up but has played well this year.
Pearce more consistent than Downes but not match fit yet.

As a pairing Downes and McDonald as we've not seen Pearce enough this season. :keepie:

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by YellowMurphy » 09 Oct 2014, 14:36

Bigman wrote:I haven't seen Pearce this season, but would go with the other two simply because they were the partnership when we had our amazing run of form. Pearce and Downes were together most of last season and we didn't do well so I'd be concerned their partnership breeds unconfidence (or whatever the actual word for that is).
But Pearce is a bit quicker! We must play him! Can you not remember last season when he was 'amazing'..?

Pearce, Downes or MacDonald

by Bigman » 09 Oct 2014, 11:32

I haven't seen Pearce this season, but would go with the other two simply because they were the partnership when we had our amazing run of form. Pearce and Downes were together most of last season and we didn't do well so I'd be concerned their partnership breeds unconfidence (or whatever the actual word for that is).

Top