by ferrarilover » 03 Mar 2011, 11:16
Fletch wrote:My one memory of him that sticks out, was him losing the ball to the opposition midfielder about 10 yards into their half in front of the grandstand. And standing there watching, with hands on hips, while his opposite number gave our full back (might even have been Mo in his only home match) a total runaround. I dont think Bucks played him much after that
(and before the grammar/punctuation nazis ambush me, I know you shouldnt start a sentence with "And", it just seemed appropriate) ![Whistle :whistle:](./images/smilies/whistle.gif)
Aah, I mentioned this a while back and was told that the form has changed. It seems now there is a level of social acceptance to the practice sufficiently strong to afford it the status of 'common usage'. I still feel odd putting a comma in front of a conjoining word, but my informal writing demands it with increasing frequency.
Also, yes, JT is a loser.
Matt.
[quote="Fletch"]My one memory of him that sticks out, was him losing the ball to the opposition midfielder about 10 yards into their half in front of the grandstand. And standing there watching, with hands on hips, while his opposite number gave our full back (might even have been Mo in his only home match) a total runaround. I dont think Bucks played him much after that :)
[color=#FF0000](and before the grammar/punctuation nazis ambush me, I know you shouldnt start a sentence with "And", it just seemed appropriate)[/color] :whistle:[/quote]
Aah, I mentioned this a while back and was told that the form has changed. It seems now there is a level of social acceptance to the practice sufficiently strong to afford it the status of 'common usage'. I still feel odd putting a comma in front of a conjoining word, but my informal writing demands it with increasing frequency.
Also, yes, JT is a loser.
Matt.