TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by merse btpir » 15 Apr 2017, 07:06

What happened to Brighton because of Bill Archer is a very good analogy ~ and hopefully not a portent ~ for any Torquay United supporter to take note of.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Neal » 15 Apr 2017, 06:42

Just seen a report on BBC breakfast about Brightons current success. Guy said that Brighton fans have suffered so much over the last 30 years. Try being a TUFC fan mate, my god!

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Gullscorer » 12 Apr 2017, 08:27

Yep, that's it. :)

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Glostergull » 12 Apr 2017, 02:02

Gullscorer wrote: 11 Apr 2017, 16:52 I seem to remember someone saying somewhere on this forum that the value of something is whatever the purchaser is actually paying for it..
I think you mean "The value of something is what someone is willing to pay for it".

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by MellowYellow » 11 Apr 2017, 23:19

There are two approaches the Council will take to the valuation of development land:

+ comparison with the sale price of land for comparable development; and/or

+ assessment of the value of the scheme as completed and deduction of the costs of development (including developer’s profit) to arrive at the underlying land value.

It is likely that a valuation would utilise both approaches, and the degree to which either, or both, are relevant depends upon the nature of the development being considered, and the complexity of the issues.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Gullscorer » 11 Apr 2017, 21:37

Merse is correct.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by merse btpir » 11 Apr 2017, 19:52

Dazza wrote: 11 Apr 2017, 19:23 Sorry but thats not right I'm afraid. Practically all land has a value - its the amount of that value that is likely to dictate what you pay for it.
But if you can't sell it at that valuation ~ which is what you are confusing with 'value' ~ then it is only worth what you can sell it for.

A valuation is not a value; it is an estimation of a value!

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by standupsitdown » 11 Apr 2017, 19:45

I'm sure TUST will have looked at this but isn't the covenant on the ground the most crucial factor. If the council can be forced to maintain this then the land is of no value to GI. The Council therefore gain less by selling it or TUST have a greater chance of being able to buy it.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by gullintwoplaces » 11 Apr 2017, 19:39

Dazza wrote: 11 Apr 2017, 19:23 Sorry but thats not right I'm afraid. Practically all land has a value - its the amount of that value that is likely to dictate what you pay for it.
True, but the value of undeveloped land is heavily influenced by planning potential, which is in turn dependent on planning permission granted by Councils. In other words, Torbay Council can effectively determine the market value of land that it owns.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Dazza » 11 Apr 2017, 19:23

Sorry but thats not right I'm afraid. Practically all land has a value - its the amount of that value that is likely to dictate what you pay for it.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by merse btpir » 11 Apr 2017, 19:06

Well if the 'restraints' mean no-one will bid for it then it has no value does it; hence re-enforcing my view that 'the value of something is whatever the purchaser is actually paying for it'

No buyer=no value!

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Dazza » 11 Apr 2017, 17:33

I,m not sure I can agree with the posters. Surely the land value has to be determined by the Council given whatever restraints are on the land re it's development. The Council can't surely just wish restraints away and inflate a value pretendIng the restraints are not there ( much as some ratepayers might well wish). Only by application to the responsible bodies can land restraints be lifted and the sort of dream value being talked about here be realised. That's certainly how I understand it.

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Gullscorer » 11 Apr 2017, 16:52

I seem to remember someone saying somewhere on this forum that the value of something is whatever the purchaser is actually paying for it..

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Richinns » 11 Apr 2017, 13:14

I am sure TUST are actively seeking to get the Asset of Community Value correctly associated with the freehold as they were previously informed was in place. Hopefully this is successful but I think it is important to note that whilst this will provide short term protection for the club (a period for funds to be raised) in truth it will not stop the Council eventually selling to their preferred bidder.
As part of the ACV process - the community has a six month time-frame period to fund raise and acquire the asset should it become available. Great in principle but the trouble is with this 'valuation' of the land. The valuation is not simply based on the land itself but what value (once developed) the Council think this land would/could be worth. You can imagine the figure which would be placed on that say should housing/supermarket/cinema etc etc be planned for the site.
Seeing as the Council are the ones who decide on this purchase figure - should they feel selling to (say GI) would be more valuable to them (or/and how they interpret the benefits to the local area) then they are not likely to be favourable with the desired amount they want for it. The community would have first refusal should they raise the stated amount (but in reality will never be able to do so).

TUFC TV - CLARKE OSBORNE

by Soupdragon » 11 Apr 2017, 11:34

Eddukkk12 wrote: 11 Apr 2017, 00:15 Not if your only trying to raise awareness of the issue you dont need to wait for the election. As i said its a gimmick but given the number of votes most coucil members get (hundereds rather then thousands) it might get a few asking questions about issues raised
Oh, how I hate to rain on people's parade: but do you have any idea how difficult it actually is to get elected?

As I recall, a 'gull' (and I'm pretty sure it wasn't Gilbert, but I could be wrong) declared as a candidate for directly elected mayor back in 2005, on a platform of free parking or some such, but backed off pretty sharpish when he realised just how much he would stand to lose if he didn't get elected (as a minimum, it was £500 to stand and £500 to have an entry in the council's publication, before anything else). Yes, you might raise awareness for a few brief moments, but - believe me - you won't get elected here.

I wholeheartedly agree that we need a much broader spectrum of people representing us, especially at local government level where decisions really do affect our everyday lives, but to try and break the two-party system that has operated for yonks now in Torbay is hugely difficult. There's a single ward in Brixham which is almost a different country; other than that, there has been just one person standing as an independent elected locally in Torbay in about the last 40-odd years.

Barring a by-election, the next Torbay local elections are in May 2019. Being deadly serious, if you want to get elected as an independent, I suggest you start work right now. It will be all the more difficult as we don't have a daily newspaper in the Bay (the WMN sells only 400 copies in Torquay), and barely a weekly one to all extents and purposes anymore, so there's few opportunities for publicity at a local level.

Raising awareness via a website is an idea, but bear in mind that this very site, the top result in any Google search for a TUFC forum, barely makes a dent in the knowledge of TUFC-related matters to either the local population or even to the majority of people who attend TUFC matches. This site, together with the TFF and BTPIR, has been warning for years now about the issues our club has been facing, and it's made no difference at all to the coverage in any local media or the awareness of the average TUFC fan.

If you want to get elected, as a minimum you'll need to deliver regular and frequent newsletters to every single address in your chosen ward to keep your face and name in front of people, and be prepared to hold regular public meetings where either no-one will turn up or people will just want to know what you're going to do about parking or Oldway/the Pavilion. You could work your backside off for the next two years and still get nowhere.

It's not impossible, of course. But if Nick Bye, arguably the most well-known name in local politics, and the sitting incumbent at the time, couldn't win a mayoral election as an independent, then its fair to say that it's not going to be easy for an unknown.

And, speaking personally, I would never give my vote to a gimmick.

Top