Bringing TUFC fans together, from Plainmoor to across the globe
Skip to content
by Calis » 03 Aug 2017, 16:52
nickbrod wrote: 02 Aug 2017, 16:04 They still wouldn't see it unless they can read backwards in a mirror!
by nickbrod » 02 Aug 2017, 16:04
Plainmoor78 wrote: 01 Aug 2017, 19:16 Some people need the above quote to be tattooed on their foreheads.
by tomogull » 02 Aug 2017, 15:01
by Plainmoor78 » 01 Aug 2017, 19:16
hector wrote: 01 Aug 2017, 10:58 It may be that some are persuaded by a shiny ORANGE/MANGO Nike kit, a new website and badge but let's just remember that Clarke Osborne is a property developer who DOES NOT build new stadiums. He is, however, very adept at somehow helping clubs lose the stadium they play in.
by Southampton Gull » 01 Aug 2017, 18:43
by hector » 01 Aug 2017, 10:58
torregull wrote: 30 Jul 2017, 16:37 Yes.and avoids situations where these questions will be asked: Fans Forum,meeting with TUST Board,meeting With Kevin Foster MP(postponed by Osborne twice now),local Business Forums;with Nicho representing the club instead.He doesn't like scrutiny and those that would scrutinise.
by torregull » 30 Jul 2017, 16:37
SenorDingDong wrote: 29 Jul 2017, 13:33 Furthermore he steadfastly refuses to comment upon his history unless he's pushed very hard - i.e Swindon speedway, and even when he does comment it's very suspicious and doesn't feel people full of confidence. Not once has he given us a reason or stated why his numerous other stadium ventures have failed and why we should trust him with our club, regardless of the largely positive behind the scenes actions of this summer.
by arrywithanh » 29 Jul 2017, 21:09
by SenorDingDong » 29 Jul 2017, 13:33
merse btpir wrote: 29 Jul 2017, 10:53 None of what you write is dismissed; however you ~ like Dave Thomas in the Herald Express ~ stubbornly or inadvertently ~ neglect to acknowledge the elephant in the room. Namely that Clarke Osborne has not once delivered a single opened and operating project in over thirty years of promising and renaging on such projects; and as it is he who is the proponent in such a vision the whole thing is rendered invalid!
by goody2449 » 29 Jul 2017, 10:57
by merse btpir » 29 Jul 2017, 10:53
by goody2449 » 29 Jul 2017, 10:44
by goody2449 » 29 Jul 2017, 10:21
by merse btpir » 24 Jul 2017, 21:21
by happytorq » 24 Jul 2017, 21:01
merse btpir wrote: 24 Jul 2017, 20:51 You have to look beyond that and not be so naïve as to miss the point that 'the club' is owned by who? You now the answer to that so why are you so blinkered and easily taken in?
Top