tauntongull wrote: 27 Aug 2018, 10:18I'm still up for a fight but the reality is that we are way out of our depth here. Generally, the way to directly impact people like CO is to hit them in the pocket. His safety net is the freehold of Plainmoor for redevelopment and we would be well served to concentrate all our efforts as fans to ensure that he does not obtain this.
I've not been on this site for so long due to the mind-numbing and puerile responses of too many regarding serious issues ~ I even forgot my password!
I came on here in the first place to raise awareness of the issue of Clarke Osborne and the manner in which the Club had been handed to him on a plate and once again I want to draw attention to the passage I've quoted above as being the most succinct and appropriate observation of recent events so that anyone with even half a brain should realise that it is this issue that it is enveloping the Club that must take priority above all else and that events of this week are creating a diversion from.
Make no mistake; the Club is wholly and solely reliant on Clarke Osborne as to whether or not it continues to exist or not. That he chooses to continue his absence from match days does not in any way diminish his interest or total; control over present and future events.
Events on the field and over the manager seem to ignite far more collective awareness and anger from the average supporter than the wholly decisive issue as to what the final cost could be if the freehold of Plainmoor or the vacating of a local authority owned stadium for a private one were to become reality.
Think on that; and whilst we're at it think on the destructive effect events such as last week's assault on the image of the club and the self respect of the manager had whilst on the road and in front of many youngsters attending their first ever professional football match and their bewildered parents.
Andy Full's appalling misbehaviour from a so called adult was a shameful example of our club to set before the Slough supporters and shamed every one of the Yellow Army present and yet I see little if any condemnation of that on here.
Ask questions too as to why former characters who had a direct bearing on the decline of this club into the hostage it is today of a property developer continue to accept hospitality from him ~ and in the case of Ian Hayman, allowed him to obtain the necessary extra share holding to take the club further into the classification of private company that now enables him to further prevent the supporter and remaining small shareholders from obtaining clarity as to what exactly he is up to regards
OUR football club.
You see
Ian Hayman and Thea Bristow sitting there at most matches; go up and ask them what the hell they've been up to leading to all this and if they are the supporters that their 'Presidents for Life' suggest they should be; then precisely what their objectives are in continuing to associate themselves with Clarke Osborne.
There might be a perfectly acceptable and plausible reason to all this; but who would know given the degree of disdain they clearly show towards the rapidly declining rank and file of the support that is left of this club?
Never mind protesting over the manager; get off your arses and put these people on the spot!
I'll go back to
BTPIR now and if anyone wants to learn what else I have to say on this subject then feel free to log on and read it and if you are not a member of that members only accessible forum then join today
http://thelondonlabia.proboards.com/
...that's not an attempt to usurp this site and it's much larger readership; merely me focussing concentrating my energy on one front whilst Louis and Dave fight on his one.
Best wishes to all!
[quote=tauntongull post_id=229652 time=1535365136 user_id=2543][i][b]I'm still up for a fight but the reality is that we are way out of our depth here. Generally, the way to directly impact people like CO is to hit them in the pocket. His safety net is the freehold of Plainmoor for redevelopment and we would be well served to [size=150]concentrate all our efforts as fans to ensure that he does not obtain this[/size].[/b][/i][/quote]
[b]I've not been on this site for so long due to the mind-numbing and puerile responses of too many regarding serious issues ~ I even forgot my password![/b]
I came on here in the first place to raise awareness of the issue of Clarke Osborne and the manner in which the Club had been handed to him on a plate and once again I want to draw attention to the passage I've quoted above as being the most succinct and appropriate observation of recent events so that anyone with even half a brain should realise that it is this issue that it is enveloping the Club that must take priority above all else and that events of this week are creating a diversion from.
[b][size=150]
Make no mistake; the Club is wholly and solely reliant on Clarke Osborne as to whether or not it continues to exist or not. That he chooses to continue his absence from match days does not in any way diminish his interest or total; control over present and future events.[/size][/b]
Events on the field and over the manager seem to ignite far more collective awareness and anger from the average supporter than the wholly decisive issue as to what the final cost could be if the freehold of Plainmoor or the vacating of a local authority owned stadium for a private one were to become reality.
Think on that; and whilst we're at it think on the destructive effect events such as last week's assault on the image of the club and the self respect of the manager had whilst on the road and in front of many youngsters attending their first ever professional football match and their bewildered parents.
Andy Full's appalling misbehaviour from a so called adult was a shameful example of our club to set before the Slough supporters and shamed every one of the Yellow Army present and yet I see little if any condemnation of that on here.
Ask questions too as to why former characters who had a direct bearing on the decline of this club into the hostage it is today of a property developer continue to accept hospitality from him ~ and in the case of Ian Hayman, allowed him to obtain the necessary extra share holding to take the club further into the classification of private company that now enables him to further prevent the supporter and remaining small shareholders from obtaining clarity as to what exactly he is up to regards [b]OUR[/b] football club.
You see [b]Ian Hayman and Thea Bristow [/b]sitting there at most matches; go up and ask them what the hell they've been up to leading to all this and if they are the supporters that their 'Presidents for Life' suggest they should be; then precisely what their objectives are in continuing to associate themselves with Clarke Osborne.
There might be a perfectly acceptable and plausible reason to all this; but who would know given the degree of disdain they clearly show towards the rapidly declining rank and file of the support that is left of this club?
[b]Never mind protesting over the manager; get off your arses and put these people on the spot![/b]
I'll go back to [b]BTPIR[/b] now and if anyone wants to learn what else I have to say on this subject then feel free to log on and read it and if you are not a member of that members only accessible forum then join today
http://thelondonlabia.proboards.com/
...that's not an attempt to usurp this site and it's much larger readership; merely me focussing concentrating my energy on one front whilst Louis and Dave fight on his one.
[b][size=150]Best wishes to all![/size][/b]