by WestLondonYellow » 14 Feb 2024, 16:57
standupsitdown wrote: 14 Feb 2024, 16:11
We or Osborne's company?
Which one, there's about 1000 he has his name to
Osborne's company of course :-) but there is as much chance of this actually happening as there is seeing Piglet flying by the window so the discussion is a distraction from another agenda.
One thing to add though, if 3G/4G pitches would be so lucrative, why not build them anyway, alongside a cafe/bar etc, and leave the whole new stadium proposal out of it. Surely it matters not if there is a new stadium next to them or not, if the pitches are supposedly outside the stadium as mentioned in "TorquayUnited" post.
They could be part of a bad weather training ground solution for the club. And wouldn't it be easier to do this, regarding cost, location and planning permission, to set up this lucrative income minus a new stadium?
However, as already mentioned above, all this talk is nothing but a distraction, it's an Osborne tactic and part of the mode of operation he always follows. I am certain some of the posters on this forum are fully paid up Osborne minions.
We need a lot more clarity on the finances on the existing set up, some forensic accountancy needs to be conducted rather than just accept what we are told the losses are.
[quote=standupsitdown post_id=279322 time=1707927074 user_id=19272]
We or Osborne's company? [b][u]Which one, there's about 1000 he has his name to[/u][/b]
[/quote]
Osborne's company of course :-) but there is as much chance of this actually happening as there is seeing Piglet flying by the window so the discussion is a distraction from another agenda.
One thing to add though, if 3G/4G pitches would be so lucrative, why not build them anyway, alongside a cafe/bar etc, and leave the whole new stadium proposal out of it. Surely it matters not if there is a new stadium next to them or not, if the pitches are supposedly outside the stadium as mentioned in "TorquayUnited" post.
They could be part of a bad weather training ground solution for the club. And wouldn't it be easier to do this, regarding cost, location and planning permission, to set up this lucrative income minus a new stadium?
However, as already mentioned above, all this talk is nothing but a distraction, it's an Osborne tactic and part of the mode of operation he always follows. I am certain some of the posters on this forum are fully paid up Osborne minions.
We need a lot more clarity on the finances on the existing set up, some forensic accountancy needs to be conducted rather than just accept what we are told the losses are.
