by Taelee73 » 29 Feb 2024, 08:20
I had a brief chat with Kevin Nicholson yesterday, he gave me a very basic idea of the formula Exeter use. It's all obvious stuff, I appreciate City are fan run and have a larger fan base than us. However should it be what we aspire to do to be self sufficient, if on a smaller scale as Torquay United or a phoenix club ?
Subscription service, the fans pay a set amount per month into the club. The number stands at around 5000, if they pay £10 a month that's £600,000 a year income, if it's £20 a month............ Not sure what number we could get to, but a 1000 paying £20 a month could give us a decent income.
Football in the Community. We do do this, but City go further, they do marathons etc and spread the word/engage the local and wider community, as well as bringing in extra income.
Centre of Excellence. A must for us. Exeter and Plymouth will take their pick, but there will be still enough young players to pick from. Exeter base it on making more money overall from them than what they spend. Either through a player having extended time in the first team or selling them for the profit.
Loans, no relations, no injury prone players. They tend to thoroughly scout for 5 decent players. These can then integrate with the main squad and have consistency in the first team. No chopping and changing the first 11 constantly.
Good communication. Both City and Argyle want to help, it's beneficial for them to have a lower level professional club nearby. Trusts should also work together providing information and ideas.
City also have regular meetings between all the above strands, good communication is key.
Anyhow, it took City 15 years to get there, it also takes a lot of time, energy, willing people to get there. It have starts small and necessarily cheap. If a new owner could get these all up and running, it would put an end to a new stadium or other ventures needed to be financially viable.
Could it happen here? Well the subscription could work if not outright ownership, if those paying had some say in the clubs running on non playing matters.
Anyhow I appreciate it's all pie in the sky as we sit on the brink. But if we get a new owner or have to start from scratch, aren't all of these these necessary to be sufficient long term?
I had a brief chat with Kevin Nicholson yesterday, he gave me a very basic idea of the formula Exeter use. It's all obvious stuff, I appreciate City are fan run and have a larger fan base than us. However should it be what we aspire to do to be self sufficient, if on a smaller scale as Torquay United or a phoenix club ?
Subscription service, the fans pay a set amount per month into the club. The number stands at around 5000, if they pay £10 a month that's £600,000 a year income, if it's £20 a month............ Not sure what number we could get to, but a 1000 paying £20 a month could give us a decent income.
Football in the Community. We do do this, but City go further, they do marathons etc and spread the word/engage the local and wider community, as well as bringing in extra income.
Centre of Excellence. A must for us. Exeter and Plymouth will take their pick, but there will be still enough young players to pick from. Exeter base it on making more money overall from them than what they spend. Either through a player having extended time in the first team or selling them for the profit.
Loans, no relations, no injury prone players. They tend to thoroughly scout for 5 decent players. These can then integrate with the main squad and have consistency in the first team. No chopping and changing the first 11 constantly.
Good communication. Both City and Argyle want to help, it's beneficial for them to have a lower level professional club nearby. Trusts should also work together providing information and ideas.
City also have regular meetings between all the above strands, good communication is key.
Anyhow, it took City 15 years to get there, it also takes a lot of time, energy, willing people to get there. It have starts small and necessarily cheap. If a new owner could get these all up and running, it would put an end to a new stadium or other ventures needed to be financially viable.
Could it happen here? Well the subscription could work if not outright ownership, if those paying had some say in the clubs running on non playing matters.
Anyhow I appreciate it's all pie in the sky as we sit on the brink. But if we get a new owner or have to start from scratch, aren't all of these these necessary to be sufficient long term?