Support

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Support

Re: Support

by Southampton Gull » 31 May 2011, 16:00

Oh I'm sure you won't...............for reason see previous posts ;-)

Re: Support

by Fletch » 31 May 2011, 15:58

Southampton Gull wrote:I'm sure now the agony of defeat is lessening he might feel less inclined to stand by what he said but you're still intent on calling him a f**kwit so like I said, that says more about you than him.
I shall do my best not to lose too much sleep over that Dave :na:

Re: Support

by Southampton Gull » 31 May 2011, 15:50

Fletch wrote: As you say Dave, its all about opinions.

My opinion is that anyone who comes out with crap like "The daytrippers fu*ked me off all day and ruined my day" or "I don't want these people on a regular basis. They ruined the experience for me and a lot of other torquay fans" and the like, is a f**kwit.

Ive already said I dont have anything against those that want to jump around and shout all game. I prefer to concentrate on watching the game personally but each to their own.

Feel free to hold your differing opinion...

I'm sure now the agony of defeat is lessening he might feel less inclined to stand by what he said but you're still intent on calling him a **** so like I said, that says more about you than him.

Re: Support

by Southampton Gull » 31 May 2011, 15:46

Far too complicated Gloster, all that's needed at Plainmoor is a section that people can use knowing full well that it's there for singers. Doesn't even have to be where the most noise can be made (away end). If it's clearly visible and people know it's there specifically for those that want to sing then there should be no problems. Buckle wanted the singers to move to the end of the Pop nearest the away fans which was really working, the only problem as I could see it was the stewards all seemed to assume we were there for aggro of some kind. I seemed to be a target, omce when I'd been in the ground for 10 minutes and had my back turned to the pitch while I was talking to Thomas and Paul about the game to follow, I hadn't even joined in the few songs that had already been sung. It's not really a major thing to me, I just found it strange at the time. If the Club were to back it and things could be arranged so the Stewards knew exactly what was happening then I'm sure that kind of thing could be avoided.

As for those big games, the singing section worked fine at Wembley against Cambridge, this time around it was the fault of those arranging ticket sales at the Club, I say that in full belief because as we all saw, Stevenage managed it fine.

I'll be in contact with the Club over the summer with some ideas and see what they think, I guess it depends on how bothered they really are I suppose.

Re: Support

by Fletch » 31 May 2011, 15:41

Southampton Gull wrote:I think it's pretty pathetic to jump on smithy for his opinion that they pissed him off. He's a regular fan, he's made plenty of trips to see us when he was at Portsmouth Uni and is committed to going as often as possible. If during our biggest game of the year he gets pissed off by "day-trippers" why shouldn't he say it on here? It's just his opinion.

My own opinion is that I'm happy for as many as possible to follow us to any game but I can certainly sympathise with his feelings on it.

Incidentally, before the game started it was like a morgue in WU103, I stood on my seat to start a song to try and get others to join in and an old guy behind me tried to pull me off it and asked me to keep quiet. I found it quite funny to be honest and explained that I was just trying to get some singing going and asked if he saw the Shrewsbury game on tv. I chatted on and off to him and asked him to attend Plainmoor to give it a go because like a lot of us I'm sure he'd get the bug and I'm sure smiffy would have done the same even though he'd rather not have been sat amongst them.

Calling him a **** for being honest enough to say what he said says more about you than him to be honest. It takes allsorts Fletch, the very point you're trying to make is lost in your attack on him. I've got a lot of time for your opinions, even if I don't always agree with them, but this time I just think you're being a bit of a plank. I'm sure I am at times as well and usually I get told pretty quickly, but most of the time I'm just pushing people into a debate because even if I seem to totally disagree with them I might just be trying to get them to share more than they might have intended. I don't have a problem with you at all but that doesn't mean I can't disect your views when I choose to ;-)
As you say Dave, its all about opinions.

My opinion is that anyone who comes out with crap like "The daytrippers fu*ked me off all day and ruined my day" or "I don't want these people on a regular basis. They ruined the experience for me and a lot of other torquay fans" and the like, is a f**kwit.

Ive already said I dont have anything against those that want to jump around and shout all game. I prefer to concentrate on watching the game personally but each to their own.

Feel free to hold your differing opinion...

Re: Support

by Glostergull » 31 May 2011, 15:33

There has been a lot said about the day tripppers and the singers. i for one can understand the way certain folks within the TUFC support fraternity don't like singing. I for one have been told to pipe down because we don't do sining at Plainmoor and was on this site years before many of you complaining about the lack of singing and Plainmoor sounding like a morgue. let alone anywhere else. But there may be an answer among us. The easiest answer to selling tickets in a hurry.
it's not beyond the bounds of possibility for a fan among us to be a real whizz at the computer. There is no reason why this fan could not set up a program to sell tickets for a stadium which could be programed to show the seats at that stadium and then all the club need do is set up a series of terminals in the shop or Boots and Laces with one person overseeing them in each place and then those with cards could buy them online and even specify which area they wanted. All it then needs is to print out a ticket which they can take to the office and the tickets can be ripped out of the relevant books quickly and efficiently. I am also sure that the club could find a few supporters who could lend them computer terminals which could be set up and linked easily to do this thereby costing the club very little. It's up to us to help in anyway we can.
Although I bet if a supporter can be found would he then say. Oh i want a lot of money to do that. Hmm Then it comes right back to the same argument. Cost versus time. in which case our arguments are not worthy. either we help or we cannot expect anything to happen. Some of those in the club are maybe not particular football supporters. Its their job and who are we to critisise for them doing thier job. if can't assist them with our knowledge

Re: Support

by Southampton Gull » 31 May 2011, 15:12

I think it's pretty pathetic to jump on smithy for his opinion that they pissed him off. He's a regular fan, he's made plenty of trips to see us when he was at Portsmouth Uni and is committed to going as often as possible. If during our biggest game of the year he gets pissed off by "day-trippers" why shouldn't he say it on here? It's just his opinion.

My own opinion is that I'm happy for as many as possible to follow us to any game but I can certainly sympathise with his feelings on it.

Incidentally, before the game started it was like a morgue in WU103, I stood on my seat to start a song to try and get others to join in and an old guy behind me tried to pull me off it and asked me to keep quiet. I found it quite funny to be honest and explained that I was just trying to get some singing going and asked if he saw the Shrewsbury game on tv. I chatted on and off to him and asked him to attend Plainmoor to give it a go because like a lot of us I'm sure he'd get the bug and I'm sure smiffy would have done the same even though he'd rather not have been sat amongst them.

Calling him a **** for being honest enough to say what he said says more about you than him to be honest. It takes allsorts Fletch, the very point you're trying to make is lost in your attack on him. I've got a lot of time for your opinions, even if I don't always agree with them, but this time I just think you're being a bit of a plank. I'm sure I am at times as well and usually I get told pretty quickly, but most of the time I'm just pushing people into a debate because even if I seem to totally disagree with them I might just be trying to get them to share more than they might have intended. I don't have a problem with you at all but that doesn't mean I can't disect your views when I choose to ;-)

Re: Support

by Fletch » 31 May 2011, 14:39

Southampton Gull wrote:I think someone must have nicked Fletch's normal spot, he seems mighty angry at those who attend regularly :rofl:
Personally speaking Dave, I have no particular affinity with people who attend regularly or those that dont. There are plenty of people that either live too far away to attend regularly or, as the case may be, find it difficult to justify the cost involved attending matches on a regular basis, particularly when you take into account a family visit. I certainly dont think they should be vilified by f**kwits who seem to think that the playoffs were laid on for "them" and anyone that attended OT as a special treat is less worthy then "them". Just to repeat one of the comments "The daytrippers fu*ked me off all day and ruined my day". If you think that being a "regular" supporter entitles you that sort of view then fine, you're welcome to associate yourself with that opinion. I think it's pretty pathetic to be honest...

Re: Support

by Southampton Gull » 31 May 2011, 14:19

I think someone must have nicked Fletch's normal spot, he seems mighty angry at those who attend regularly :rofl:

Re: Support

by Regiment » 31 May 2011, 14:13

i'm guessing when people applied for the cheapest tickets, they were just sold the singing section on the misguided assumption, that it was the reason people wanted the £26. I wanted £36 tickets behind the singing section, so i could be in/around the singing section, but slightly further back. did i get them ?? did i balls. i was in the corner trying to generate a bit of noise, to little avail.

Re: Support

by Fletch » 31 May 2011, 13:11

forevertufc wrote:All people have done on this thread is moan and complian about the organization ,and "not" about either the day trippers or non-regular fans,this why despite out numbering the Stevenage fans 2-1 they totaly out sung us,because Stevenage just did a loud block from the start and we did not.
Forever, perhaps you might like to read earlier posts on this thread. I will paste them here for you though
I don't want these people on a regular basis. They ruined the experience for me and a lot of other torquay fans
The daytrippers fu*ked me off all day and ruined my day. I would obviously take them regularly because we need the income, however I do feel they ruined the atmosphere at old trafford and contributed massively to the sh*t atmosphere
Seem pretty obvious pops at those that fancied a day out watching Torquay at OT if you ask me...

Re: Support

by SteveDeckchair » 30 May 2011, 18:24

The Stevenage players were up for it from the off and their fans had a drum and were very well co-ordinated. Well done to them!

Torquay didn't give us much to shout about and we were spread out with chants starting all over the place and not really going anywhere. It got better in the second half when everyone moved, but I could barely hear the singers from the corner in the first half. We really missed a trick.

Yet another disappointing aspect to the day, of which there were so many.....

Re: Support

by UpminsterGull » 30 May 2011, 18:19

Just back after making a weekend of it.

Singing area was a good idea but tickets were sold here to people with young kids who clearly didn't want to stand and sing. Some moved in the first half, but the singers only really got going when some moved to the back of the higher tier at half time. We joined them and the 2nd half was more enjoyable, plus better view - but just a shame about the football.

There were only a few days to sell the tickets, but plans could have been made & announced before the 2nd leg at Shrewsbury. This often happens at other clubs and Torquay should have got organised and if necessary brought in temporary staff.

Lessons should be learned for next time.

Re: Support

by Dave » 30 May 2011, 14:17

Richinns wrote:Stevenage fans were great on the day and fair play to them.

I think it if the club had set up a 'loud section' from the very start and sold it as this then we would not be talking about this now. When somebody asked for a £26 ticket they could have given them 2 options - do you want to be with the noisy rowdy lot or do you want to be elsewhere? It would not have been hard to do. If they (which seems to be the case) are just allocating £26 tickets in and around the 'singing section', as it was so called, then this is the reason for the confusion and lack of atmosphere. It cannot be blamed on the fans in those sections who are not into singing and chanting as they are simply filling the seat they have been allocated.

I like to join in with the some of the songs and chants so close to the outskirts of the hub of noise suits me. This does not make me any less of a fan than those in the thick of it. I don't think anybody in this thread is suggesting that so I am not sure what all the aggro is about here?
These excatly the points i was trying to make,its about giving poeple the choice and the information to make that choice,there should have allocated a "loud section"from the start then when any fan requested a ticket for that section imform them that this block is the loud section,then anyone who brought a ticket for this section would have had no right to tell someone else to sit down and cut the noise,or sit there glum faced because they have ended up by mistake in the loud section.

All people have done on this thread is moan and complian about the organization ,and "not" about either the day trippers or non-regular fans,this why despite out numbering the Stevenage fans 2-1 they totaly out sung us,because Stevenage just did a loud block from the start and we did not.

Re: Support

by kingsgull » 30 May 2011, 13:06

Fonda wrote:So are you suggesting Dave that anyone that didn't want to sing, should have been told to sit in the corner? Because if you wanted a £26 ticket those were the options - in in the middle with the singers, or in the corners. So why should these 'day-trippers' have been forced to sit in the corners, just to keep the 'singers' happy? We need to attract more fans, and as i alluded to earlier in this thread, our 'ultras' or 'popside singers' or whatever they want to refer to themselves as, are in danger of creating a clique - and that is not a good thing if we want to increase numbers. If certain people consider themselves 'better supporters' than others - based only on the fact that they want to sing and jump around, we're never going to appeal to more casual supporters. And we need to start appealing to casual supporters, because there simply aren't enough regular supporters. What annoyed me most was not the people not singing, it was that people trying to start chants, only to be drowned out because the more regular group of singers starting a completely different chant moments later.
fair points Fonda but i started chants in row wl103 and was blowing the horn as it was a bit like a funeral party my end and wanted to get things going as the singing section needed support as you could not hear anything our side...

Top