by diamondgirl » 01 Jun 2011, 10:56
As I see it:
A) Bristol Rovers should have waited untill OUR season was over before approaching Buckle.
B) Once the approach was made our board should have asked BR to wait untill OUR season was over.
C) Buckle was, obviously, the man BR wanted. He would not have lost the chance to be offered the job, even if he had asked them to wait a couple of weeks. Freindlygas, You may be able to answer this. Was anyone else in the running?
D) As we all knew that "Something" was going on, so must our players. It can not have been easy for them to concentrate 100% on the final, and I feel that it cheated the paying customers, "The Fans".
E) BR took a chance and got away with it. So, to be honest, I suppose we can't blame them.
Whether or not all of this did affect our game, we won't ever know for sure, but it does leave a bitter taste in the mouth.
I guess we will come through this, as we did with the Roberts saga, but at the moment it hurts.
As I see it:
A) Bristol Rovers should have waited untill OUR season was over before approaching Buckle.
B) Once the approach was made our board should have asked BR to wait untill OUR season was over.
C) Buckle was, obviously, the man BR wanted. He would not have lost the chance to be offered the job, even if he had asked them to wait a couple of weeks. Freindlygas, You may be able to answer this. Was anyone else in the running?
D) As we all knew that "Something" was going on, so must our players. It can not have been easy for them to concentrate 100% on the final, and I feel that it cheated the paying customers, "The Fans".
E) BR took a chance and got away with it. So, to be honest, I suppose we can't blame them.
Whether or not all of this did affect our game, we won't ever know for sure, but it does leave a bitter taste in the mouth.
I guess we will come through this, as we did with the Roberts saga, but at the moment it hurts.