Torquay United Fans Forum

stevegull wrote:Maybe you all should have voted early if you felt so strongly! Get the nominations in to the new topic soon!

Scott Brehaut wrote:If you weren't such a whiny girl, driving a stupid girly orange car, you would accept defeat like a man - realising that you had been out thought, out fought and rogered up the arse by Enzo.

gasrex wrote: I won't be crying in my beer if they do get rid of him.
Oh, and I do still think he comes across as a smarmy, cocky little t**t.

Enzo

Trojan 67 wrote:When Dorothy came on, I thought here we go, I'll be following Harris to the Stewards naughty step.

AlexGulls wrote:Shame we still havent got Christie here still him and Howe could be the Fridge-Freezer combination.

wivelgull wrote: The new one looks meaner and nastier, wears shorts and tights and has a pair of feet the like I've never seen. .

Enzo wrote: Sorry, I completely misread your post. I thought you were explaining to a Bristol Rovers fan who had just witnessed a fantastic perfomance where Rovers "ripped Rotherham to shreds" and "passed them to death" your belief that it was a freak game - which based on BBC stats Rotherham controlled until Branno got sent off. If only I'd have picked up on the highlighted part, I'd have realised that the other 5 or 6 lines of your post were completely pointless and without any relevance.............if you wanted to take nothing away from Rovers why did not just ask him whether, having been at the game, he thought the stats were a fair reflection rather than advising him not to get too carried away.

By the way.......we pi55ed all over Gillingham today according to BBC text and stats. I would certainly not wish to take anything away from Gillingham after what clearly was an excellent result, but from what I saw, it was more a case of a freak game - we bossed possession, won more corners and whilst Gillingham scored 5 of their 6 shots on target we had 9 and a further 9 off target. Clearly an absolute travesty. Gillingham fans should be worried only to have 6 shots on goal during a match. They have been very lucky as when a team concedes two they are normally very lucky to even get a draw.

Irrespective of whether you made a w@nk post or I posted "old crap", statistics prove that statistics prove nothing.

Enzo wrote: Sorry, I completely misread your post. I thought you were explaining to a Bristol Rovers fan who had just witnessed a fantastic perfomance where Rovers "ripped Rotherham to shreds" and "passed them to death" your belief that it was a freak game - which based on BBC stats Rotherham controlled until Branno got sent off. If only I'd have picked up on the highlighted part, I'd have realised that the other 5 or 6 lines of your post were completely pointless and without any relevance.............if you wanted to take nothing away from Rovers why did not just ask him whether, having been at the game, he thought the stats were a fair reflection rather than advising him not to get too carried away.

By the way.......we pi55ed all over Gillingham today according to BBC text and stats. I would certainly not wish to take anything away from Gillingham after what clearly was an excellent result, but from what I saw, it was more a case of a freak game - we bossed possession, won more corners and whilst Gillingham scored 5 of their 6 shots on target we had 9 and a further 9 off target. Clearly an absolute travesty. Gillingham fans should be worried only to have 6 shots on goal during a match. They have been very lucky as when a team concedes two they are normally very lucky to even get a draw.

Irrespective of whether you made a w@nk post or I posted "old crap", statistics prove that statistics prove nothing.