Bid for Benyon rejected!

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Bid for Benyon rejected!

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by Magpiegull » 31 Jan 2011, 10:06

Interesting to see that Argyle accepted a £300K bid for striker Joe Mason from Swindon but he turned down the move.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by ferrarilover » 31 Jan 2011, 02:51

Gulli, t'was a general (and, as always, not ENTIRELY serious) comment.

Matt.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by Fletch » 30 Jan 2011, 23:25

ayellow4life wrote:Unfortunately after yesterdays result, i am expecting Benyon to be signed for another club this time tomorrow. With Austin left for Burnley now is there really much chance of us keeping hold of him? Sounds like there confident of signing him on their forum
If we get something like 180 to 200k for him (plus addons) I think that would represent good business. We will hopefully use some of that to get a Rendell type striker and play Kee alongside him.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by wiggy_10 » 30 Jan 2011, 23:21

Unfortunately after yesterdays result, i am expecting Benyon to be signed for another club this time tomorrow. With Austin left for Burnley now is there really much chance of us keeping hold of him? Sounds like there confident of signing him on their forum

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by Gulliball » 21 Jan 2011, 19:28

I don't know if that was a general comment or aimed at me, but I don't remember commenting on your description of Manset.

He's officially gone to Reading today. Fee is undisclosed - but with appearance clauses is a club record sale for Hereford, meaning it's above 440k.

He only had 6 months left on his contract too, when it would have gone to tribunal.

What chance we stood of signing him I don't know, but it was probably 0.something%

Interestingly Swindon signed a centre-back from Alfreton today for 150k. Makes the offers we're getting for Ellis and Benyon just insulting and infuriating.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by ferrarilover » 20 Jan 2011, 23:39

Gulliball wrote:Manset is going to Crystal Palace:
http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/eag ... ticle.html

Fee is meant to be in excess of 500k.

Rotherham have turned down a seven figure bid for Le Fondre, and have set a 2m price tag on him.

Exeter are up the road getting big fee after big fee.

We have a number of talented young players, and getting decent fees for them is the only way we're going to grow as a club, as our attendences and budget aren't anything special in this division. Who was the last player we managed to sell for a big fee - David Graham in 2004? Benyon will score around the same number of goals this season if he stays, maybe more, so if we can't even get the 215k we got for him then we'll be going backwards.

Roberts wasn't interested in the club, and the 95k for Jamie Ward was a travesty. But the board at the moment have no excuses for not getting the full value of the squad. What's the point of building a young squad, young manager etc and then giving them away before we've progressed.
Hardly surprising, I did warn you, I did, but would you listen, NO, you just wanted to pick on my choice of adjective!

Benners is younger than ALF, and has just 4 fewer goals so far this season. Clubs are all over him because he gets a disproportional amount of the headlines. A little like Darren Bent, who would have guessed that over a certain time frame (which I can't remember or be arsed to look up) he is just one goal behind joint leaders Drogba and Rooney with 81 goals. I nearly soiled myself in protest when I heard the fee for Bent, then I realised that he is a much better player than I thought he was, it's just he doesn't get the headlines, for whatever reason. On this principle, if ALF is subject to bids in excess of £1m, Benyon MUST be 'bite your arm off, thank you very much' value at £250,000.

Matt.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by Richinns » 20 Jan 2011, 13:29

Who deals with transfer negotiations at Torquay now? I am sure it would of been Colin Lee before he left so who has this responsibility know?

This could be key to making sure we get what the players are worth if we do sell.

If Manset is worth half a million then Benyon has to be too - right?

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by Gulliball » 20 Jan 2011, 13:03

Manset is going to Crystal Palace:

http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/eag ... ticle.html

Fee is meant to be in excess of 500k.

Rotherham have turned down a seven figure bid for Le Fondre, and have set a 2m price tag on him.

Exeter are up the road getting big fee after big fee.

We have a number of talented young players, and getting decent fees for them is the only way we're going to grow as a club, as our attendences and budget aren't anything special in this division. Who was the last player we managed to sell for a big fee - David Graham in 2004? Benyon will score around the same number of goals this season if he stays, maybe more, so if we can't even get the 215k we got for him then we'll be going backwards.

Roberts wasn't interested in the club, and the 95k for Jamie Ward was a travesty. But the board at the moment have no excuses for not getting the full value of the squad. What's the point of building a young squad, young manager etc and then giving them away before we've progressed.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by numpte » 19 Jan 2011, 10:32

On the basis that we got £35k from a tribunal for Carayol after two years and a handful of games ,I say keep Benyon until the end of the season.

On the Carayol formula, Benyon must be valued at £200k + in the summer.

That way we get to keep him and earn even more through progress in the cup.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by Yellow4life » 18 Jan 2011, 22:48

Swindons Austin wants a move away so benyon could be off there!

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by ferrarilover » 18 Jan 2011, 19:55

taunton_gull wrote:I was thinking the same - the fact that this month has been a quiet time for player movement so far (it seems rather more a managerial transfer window!) looks to have counted in our favour. No doubt the same thing will happen that happens every window and it will get busy in the last couple of days right up to the deadline. I just hope we don't get shafted as we did when Ward was sold on the last day with no time to get any replacements, then we will really be in the brown stuff.

One thing that may make it more likely that Benyon leaves before the end of the month is the fact that Charlie Austin has handed in a transfer request at Swindon. Really bad news for us as they are known to be one of EB's main admirers - so I certainly wouldn't count our chickens yet. My main hope is that the board our able to keep the squad together until the Crawley game - this is going to be the key for us. Get through and not only will we make history, the club's future could be secured for years to come.
How so? TUFC v Stevenage won't be on telly, nor will they bring many fans. :)

Matt.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by taunton_gull » 18 Jan 2011, 19:48

I was thinking the same - the fact that this month has been a quiet time for player movement so far (it seems rather more a managerial transfer window!) looks to have counted in our favour. No doubt the same thing will happen that happens every window and it will get busy in the last couple of days right up to the deadline. I just hope we don't get shafted as we did when Ward was sold on the last day with no time to get any replacements, then we will really be in the brown stuff.

One thing that may make it more likely that Benyon leaves before the end of the month is the fact that Charlie Austin has handed in a transfer request at Swindon. Really bad news for us as they are known to be one of EB's main admirers - so I certainly wouldn't count our chickens yet. My main hope is that the board our able to keep the squad together until the Crawley game - this is going to be the key for us. Get through and not only will we make history, the club's future could be secured for years to come.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by ferrarilover » 18 Jan 2011, 19:46

ayellow4life wrote:Are we saying that no news is good news?
Its now the 18th and i haven't heard anything from anywhere about him leaving.
Either that or he has been sold and no-one at either club though it necessary to inform us, or the media, or anyone for that matter :rofl:

Matt.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by wiggy_10 » 18 Jan 2011, 18:45

Are we saying that no news is good news?

Its now the 18th and i haven't heard anything from anywhere about him leaving.

Re: Bid for Benyon rejected!

by ferrarilover » 06 Jan 2011, 19:28

With all this talk of tribunals, I decided to look up their criteria for awarding kom-pen-say-shun to losing clubs. There is precious little information available on t'interweb, bit I did find this page.

http://www.football-league.co.uk/youthd ... 25_1423139

Paragraph 5 seems to be the most important, I'd have copy and pasted, but it seems I cannot do such a thing, and it's always good to have things quoted in context (isn't that right, Jonnyfive?)

There seem to me to be far too many variables (about which none of us may ever know the full details) for us to even begin to guess what a tribunal might offer.

I suggest a fee of £1,000,000 as a starting point and we'll go from there.

Matt.

Top