Lloyd Macklin

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Lloyd Macklin

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by ferrarilover » 10 Jan 2012, 17:16

I'll let you all know how he gets on tonight.

Matt.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by bobby93 » 10 Jan 2012, 16:10

Decent finish in the cup game. Also looks like he's been spending a bit of time in the gym (or is he just wearing a deceptive amount of layers?). Probably one of the most naturally gifted footballers we've got... when he wants to be. I'd give him a run out in the reserves and sit him on the bench, we need attacking options so it can't hurt.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by diamondgirl » 10 Jan 2012, 15:58

stevegull wrote: :nod:

I hope he gets a go at it, we have certainly sunk enough money into him, by giving him such a long initial contract. However, would Ling be less likely to play him as he is one of Buckle's players and not one of his own signings? It would certainly give him more room in the budget if he moved him on...
Mark Ellis. Robbo, The Irish wizard, Little Danny, none of these are Martin's signings, but they are all regulars. Personally, I like Lloyd. I think, given the chance, he could do well for TUFC. I do, however, understand that some people find him frustrating.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by tufcbrett » 09 Jan 2012, 20:38

http://www.itv.com/sport/football/facup ... ighlights/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Anyone who would like to see Macklins goal. On the right scroll down to the Southampton Salisbury game. Decent finish, sign him up haha.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by CP Gull » 09 Jan 2012, 17:51

Seems like Lloyd Macklin made a good impression on Saturday and not just with the Salisbury fans either ...

"I thought the scorer was a different class to the rest of their team.Luckily for us he was only sub. " and "Was that their number 17? Macklin was it? I thought he looked a good player" and "Also as said their scorer Lloyd Macklin did too, he started last season at Torquay, he is quick, what we need. Get him on trial as well " ... all comments taken from one of their (SUFC) fans' sites ...

http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tn ... 2115579462

Certainly took his goal well. I believe that he has now ended his loan spell with Salisbury, as originally agreed, and returned to us. Hopefully gets a run out in the Reserves soon - perhaps against Willand tomorrow? The last time I saw him play, for the Reserves v Crawley he scored a quality individual goal and I believe he has been working on building up his upper body strength which will hopefully improve him as a player. He certainly has enough natural attributes to make it as a player at this level, just needs to convert all that potential into consistent performances. It will certainly be good to have him back on our bench, if nothing else, as he certainly offers a real threat when he's in the mood and I would imagine his spell at Salibury will have done him no harm at all.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by stevegull » 08 Jan 2012, 21:59

ferrarilover wrote: Doesn't fit into the system they wanted to play in this highly unusual game.
Carrying a light injury which isn't worth risking for a game they probably aren't going to win.
Keeping him fresh for a very important league campaign rather than wasting his efforts in a match they probably aren't going to win.

Being on the bench for an hour in a single match does not automatically make him a bad player.

Matt.
:nod:

I hope he gets a go at it, we have certainly sunk enough money into him, by giving him such a long initial contract. However, would Ling be less likely to play him as he is one of Buckle's players and not one of his own signings? It would certainly give him more room in the budget if he moved him on...

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by ferrarilover » 08 Jan 2012, 02:58

brucie wrote:If he has done so well why is he only sub was Salisbury then?
Doesn't fit into the system they wanted to play in this highly unusual game.
Carrying a light injury which isn't worth risking for a game they probably aren't going to win.
Keeping him fresh for a very important league campaign rather than wasting his efforts in a match they probably aren't going to win.

Being on the bench for an hour in a single match does not automatically make him a bad player.

Matt.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by tufcbrett » 08 Jan 2012, 01:43

forevertufc wrote:When i saw this thread , i had a feeling it was going to be one from Brucie :) Macklin what a frustrating player, i have no doubt what he is capble of, i know it was only a p.s.f however he tore Exeter's full back a new rear end all game long back in the summer, this lad has got something about him as a player, what is his problem?

Funny feeling that Brett points to what it could be.
Sadly the issue is what i said. He has been given a 2nd chance by Ling. We signed him on a long contract because he has the ability, hes just doing what muzzy did and its fustrating. Ling has sent him on loan to get games and then come back and sort it out.
I hope he does because we all know he would be a decent player for the side, and his goal yesterday just shows he has the ability.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by royalgull » 08 Jan 2012, 00:47

I too thought he was good at Cheltenham and he has a genuine goal threat. More so than Stevens and about the same as Bodin i feel if he played regularly. He's a more natural striker/attacking winger.

He's still very raw, he reminds me of Carayol in the early days and his crossing and decision making at Cheltenham wasn't always the best.

I still think we might see a Carayol esque burst out of him, where he might play 6 or 7 games on the spin out of neccesity and be one of our better players.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by Gulliball » 07 Jan 2012, 23:12

I'm guessing they played quite defensively, being a part time side playing away to a side flying high in a league three divisions higher, with a £3m forward.

He'll surely have a chance here when he comes back, especially if it's before Bodin or a replacement arrives. Stevens has shown consistent form and earnt a regular place, he needs to do the same.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by Dave » 07 Jan 2012, 23:08

When i saw this thread , i had a feeling it was going to be one from Brucie :) Macklin what a frustrating player, i have no doubt what he is capble of, i know it was only a p.s.f however he tore Exeter's full back a new rear end all game long back in the summer, this lad has got something about him as a player, what is his problem?

Funny feeling that Brett points to what it could be.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by brucie » 07 Jan 2012, 23:02

If he has done so well why is he only sub was Salisbury then?

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by monkeyboy » 07 Jan 2012, 20:14

Only seen him play once this season, at the JPT game at Cheltenham, and he was arguably our best player on the night. Great pace, beat his marker for fun, tracked back well, only question mark would be delivery into the box.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by SuperNickyWroe » 07 Jan 2012, 20:07

tufcbrett wrote:All depends what his attitude is like when training. If he goes back and is the same old cant be bothered to do this in training then he wont get a game. I hope for his sake hes learnt abit while on loan and is hungry to work hard for games with us.

Hes done well for Sailsbury from what a few people have been telling me, so fingers crossed hes hungry as we could do with him on his game. Hes has the ability/protential but its down to him to make it work or not.
thats what i heard to brett from my my mate who goes to watch them.

Re: Lloyd Macklin

by tufcbrett » 07 Jan 2012, 17:55

All depends what his attitude is like when training. If he goes back and is the same old cant be bothered to do this in training then he wont get a game. I hope for his sake hes learnt abit while on loan and is hungry to work hard for games with us.

Hes done well for Sailsbury from what a few people have been telling me, so fingers crossed hes hungry as we could do with him on his game. Hes has the ability/protential but its down to him to make it work or not.

Top