Shameless plug

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Shameless plug

Re: Shameless plug

by ferrarilover » 07 Feb 2012, 13:40

Guess who...

http://www.skysports.com/fanzone/blogs/ ... 25,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Matt.

Re: Shameless plug

by ferrarilover » 11 Jan 2012, 00:45

There are some places which say 998, but then, there are places which say the Bugatti Veyron has only 991bhp, when we all know it's 1001.

Matt.

Re: Shameless plug

by Stoke_Gull » 10 Jan 2012, 23:22

"a man who was part of a defence which held firm for exactly 1000 consecutive minutes last season."

Actually I must point out that it was 998 minutes, if Vale had waited two more minutes we would have got it.

Re: Shameless plug

by Trojan 67 » 10 Jan 2012, 22:44

Matt Parkman - the name seems familiar . . .

"Why him of the five and a half hat size has the makings of a bloody hero !"

:lol:

Matt Parkman (character played by actor Greg Grunberg in the TV series Heroes).

Link : http://heroeswiki.com/Matt_Parkman" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Shameless plug

by HRG » 10 Jan 2012, 18:16

Matt, I'm not thick-skinned enough to take the abuse that would inevitably follow. :lol:

Re: Shameless plug

by happytorq » 10 Jan 2012, 17:27

ferrarilover wrote:Well spotted Haps, Ma, yes, curb, not kerb, thatll teach me to write stuff at 0400, then leave it for 24 hours to 'settle' but forget to proof read it.

Not guilty on the sub heading, that's done by Sky.

HRGie, feel free to post it on the Useless forum, put some popcorn on and enjoy the ride.

Matt.
Yeah, it was curb. Not a big deal really, but this is me.

I've already complained to our man at Sky Sports (andy C) about the shocking sub-editing. :)

Re: Shameless plug

by ferrarilover » 10 Jan 2012, 17:12

Well spotted Haps, Ma, yes, curb, not kerb, thatll teach me to write stuff at 0400, then leave it for 24 hours to 'settle' but forget to proof read it.

Not guilty on the sub heading, that's done by Sky.

HRGie, feel free to post it on the Useless forum, put some popcorn on and enjoy the ride.

Matt.

Re: Shameless plug

by diamondgirl » 10 Jan 2012, 15:50

I'll answer my own question. Yes.

Re: Shameless plug

by diamondgirl » 10 Jan 2012, 15:48

Curb?

Re: Shameless plug

by happytorq » 10 Jan 2012, 15:09

ferrarilover wrote:http://www.skysports.com/fanzone/blogs/ ... 55,00.html

MIGHT have been unkind about Buckle...

Matt.
Nice post.

Subhead should be 'just desserts', though ;-)

Also wrong use of 'kerb'.

I'm a dick, I know :)

Re: Shameless plug

by HRG » 10 Jan 2012, 14:05

You should post the link on the Rovers forum Matt. That would be my evening entertainment sorted.

Re: Shameless plug

by ferrarilover » 10 Jan 2012, 13:56

http://www.skysports.com/fanzone/blogs/ ... 55,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

MIGHT have been unkind about Buckle...

Matt.

Re: Shameless plug

by Stoke_Gull » 09 Dec 2011, 08:03

As the moron Jamie Redknapp would say, that was a "top top" article and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it as well as the previous one too. Thank you.

Re: Shameless plug

by ferrarilover » 09 Dec 2011, 00:02

That's the photo from my uni ID, never fails to get a laugh.

The piece this week is one which would probably come across better, if I could do an audio blog, so you guys can hear it the way I do in my head, where it really is an incredibly sad 800 words.

Glad you're enjoying it, as I said, hopefully the next one will be happier, praising the boys for a couple of excellent wins.

Matt.

Re: Shameless plug

by AustrianAndyGull » 08 Dec 2011, 18:18

Same here Bigman, i said he was too lightweight and got pushed off the ball easily and couldn't see what all the fuss ws about!! As for the read Matt, its ok i suppose a little boring in parts and went on far too long but apart from that it'll do. No it was a great read! Agree with Richinns though, you look like you've just been sectioned! ( you may have been previously i don't know?). :-o :scarf:

Top