Torquay United Fans Forum

He was training with us over Jan, not sure if he still is or not now. But Jake i believe was on a little trial thing to show Ling what he can do. A deal was almost done on deadline day but we couldnt afford the wages Northampton wanted us to pay. So i wouldnt suprise me if a deal could be done.

Is it though, fact that he has been training with us? It would seem a bit odd, to me. He's contracted to AC Relegated, how impressed would they be if he gets crocked doing something with us when there seems to be no benefit to Cobblers (we're not paying his salary, not if he's not playing for us). Equally, if he's not training with NTFC, there is zero chance of him being picked for the first team. I really can't believe that the chairman would allow himself to be taken for two grand a week (or whatever JR is on) in that circumstance.
Personally, I'm in agreement with our unnamed friend, I think he's on his way, it would just seem a little odd if he were training with us.

Matt.

So is death and the end of the world lol.
Why bother posting that its no more info than we aleady have.

Its FACT that he has been training with club.
We can draw same conclusion from that

[quote="Mr Anonymous"]Mr Anonymous rides again.

He's coming, you mark my words![/quote]

That's it? No timescale? No other details? Hhhhmmm - I remain pessimistic!

[quote="Mr Anonymous"]Mr Anonymous rides again.

He's coming, you mark my words![/quote]

Ive heard he's coming recently nothing reliable but this rumour refuses to go away.

Mr Anonymous rides again.

He's coming, you mark my words!

[quote="tufcbrett"]No idea if its true or not. But i was told after the game that Jakey has been training with us this week. Also this is going on because Bodin doesnt look like to be coming back It was mentioned in the Family stand.

Anyone know anything? Im just intrested to know if theres any truth to this or not.[/quote]




i heard the same

No idea if its true or not. But i was told after the game that Jakey has been training with us this week. Also this is going on because Bodin doesnt look like to be coming back It was mentioned in the Family stand.

Anyone know anything? Im just intrested to know if theres any truth to this or not.

Think of him as our very own Gok Wan ;-)[/quote]

And there is a anagram in there for Matt aswell

[quote="Southampton Gull"]

Think of him as our very own Gok Wan ;-)[/quote]

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[quote="Aussie"]
Trying my hardest not to bite! Matt is kind of strange and I`m not sure where he is coming from sometimes![/quote]

Think of him as our very own Gok Wan ;-)

I never feel frustrated arguing with him, I actually quite enjoy it!

Aussie,

What you have to remember with Matt is that he will argue that white is black - he is never, ever wrong.

You can either accept that, and just laugh to yourself reading the clear nonsense that often comes from his mouth (he can't help it, he is a (trainee) lawyer after all), or you can go the way of Cambgull and get frustrated arguing with him constantly. Either way it makes for an entertaining read for me that's for sure.

[quote="Southampton Gull"]Nice to see you settling in, Aussie :rofl: :rofl:[/quote]
Trying my hardest not to bite! Matt is kind of strange and I`m not sure where he is coming from sometimes!

[quote="ferrarilover"]That is likely true, they do ask the woman first...

And you're still wrong (there's a surprise) about my facts post. I shan't explain it here, it would be insulting to those who have grasped my very obvious point with consummate ease. (Louis, we need a *pokes Cambgull with stick* smiley).

Matt.[/quote]

There's no way I'd be the woman in our relationship Matt, that would mean you actually managed to get some p*ssy. Also, I've seen your picture. Girly face, added to the girly car. If there isn't a closet homosexual in there I'll eat my hat!

I'm not really wrong at all on your facts post, you first made a statement about a "credible rumour" which you rightly got called out for, then proceeded to make a post about facts being credible as if to gloss over your mistake. So what was this "very obvious point" then? The fact that you got it wrong, then confirmed what Aussie had told you but in a way to suggest that it had been your point in the first place. Nice attempt at NLP though, I'll give you that! :-D