If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Gullscorer » 04 Feb 2012, 12:27

So could you explain it to me please? :|

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Trojan 67 » 04 Feb 2012, 03:26

Trojan 67 wrote:To answer the thread question :

Dr Livingstone and the missionary position. :~D
Glostergull wrote:I rest my Case. My Lord.

It is said, you can't educate pork. Gloster neither has an enlightened sense of humour or an understanding of history, hence why he failed to grasp the Dr Livingstone/missionary quip.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by popside_yidlad » 03 Feb 2012, 16:39

doogull wrote:would love to see us poking around the tottenham ressies again and picking up a pacey front runner

Maybe we could loan soul coubillaly from spurs. Fits the bill but also is quite strong and runs channels well. Dont know if he is available but if so would love to see it. Could play anywhere on our front 3

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Gullscorer » 03 Feb 2012, 14:20

Agreed, and to play at Rotherham on a springtime Tuesday evening rather than a frozen snowy winter's day should work in our favour (not that we're Southern softies, of course!). It's looking good.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Jeff » 03 Feb 2012, 14:16

The postponement of the Rotherham game works out in our favour. Lingy seems pretty confident if getting some impressive names in on loan next week, so they should be available for the next home game if he pulls it off. Plus it gives the defense a bit more time at re-integrating Saah into their shapes and systems.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Gullscorer » 03 Feb 2012, 13:30

Trust in Martin Ling. He'll find the right players, and he's already indicated in interviews where he will need to strengthen the squad.

Personally I think that, while of course I'd like to see more goals from our forward players, the fact that our goals are also coming from other members of the team is working to our advantage, putting doubt, fear and confusion into the minds of opposing defenders.

Ling is getting everything right: his signings, player development, team formation, tactics, morale, and fifty points already. Exciting times ahead, with absolutely no worries. All we have to do is to turn up and support.

Six months ago, who'd have thought it? Happy days.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Glostergull » 03 Feb 2012, 02:18

I rest my Case. My Lord.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Trojan 67 » 02 Feb 2012, 20:17

To answer the thread question :


Dr Livingstone and the missionary position. :~D

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Glostergull » 30 Jan 2012, 12:30

yellow wrote: I know that the thread title talks about ‘in what positions’, but have you thought this one through properly? :bow:

Well I think I had it right. Alan said he would be happier if He had Westbay in the rear.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by yellow » 30 Jan 2012, 10:44

Glostergull wrote: Oh come on. We can do better than that.. We have our own Trojan67. He can be left outside. Matt the girly guy with the orange laces can play right behind. And I have no doubt John Bartlett Can play Back to front with Westbay Up the rear. although she would find it hard to resist coming on without her barbed wire whip
I know that the thread title talks about ‘in what positions’, but have you thought this one through properly? :bow:

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Glostergull » 30 Jan 2012, 10:28

usagullmichigan wrote:Bobby Charlton. Heard he is a young uo coming attacking midfielder.
Oh come on. We can do better than that.. We have our own Trojan67. He can be left outside. Matt the girly guy with the orange laces can play right behind. And I have no doubt John Bartlett Can play Back to front with Westbay Up the rear. although she would find it hard to resist coming on without her barbed wire whip

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by Gullscorer » 30 Jan 2012, 10:11

The fact that our goals are coming from all over the team is one of the reasons other teams will be fearing us. If most of our goals were to come from a high-scoring striker who was then injured or suspended we could be in trouble. That said, we certainly need someone to score more goals and perhaps a loan signing to guard against suspensions and injuries.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by bixieupnorth » 30 Jan 2012, 08:21

a good reliable striker, we still dont have one, tai and rene do all the hard work but they dont hit the net regularly enough, luckily everyone else is pitching in this season, but neither of them looks like they'd ever be a 25 goal a season man, which a lot of other teams seem to possess

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by usagullmichigan » 30 Jan 2012, 01:53

Bobby Charlton. Heard he is a young uo coming attacking midfielder.

Re: If we sign someone who should it be and what position?

by popside_yidlad » 30 Jan 2012, 01:38

Nathan Craig highly likely to sign. Would love to see ronan murray again but dont know length of swindon loan

Top