Keeper on loan.....

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Keeper on loan.....

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Awayday » 19 Mar 2012, 16:50

Southampton Gull wrote:
But you've never heard me singing it ;-)
But you never denied it either

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Southampton Gull » 19 Mar 2012, 16:28

Awayday wrote:
OK............. Shock!!!! horror!!!!!

I know a chant that use to have Ricey's and your name in it!

But you've never heard me singing it ;-)

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Awayday » 19 Mar 2012, 16:06

Southampton Gull wrote:Non-starter, Martin Ling has shown complete faith in his squad so far and I'm sure he would treat Martin Rice exactly the same.

OK............. Shock!!!! horror!!!!!

I know a chant that use to have Ricey's and your name in it!

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by AustrianAndyGull » 19 Mar 2012, 16:04

No worries Royal. I agree with all you have just posted anyway, apart from the bit about Ling.....he's shit!! ;-)

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by royalgull » 19 Mar 2012, 14:08

Wasn't a personal attack at you Andy, I too was hasty in my verdict on Saah. I saw the first 4 or 5 games this season and I thought the bloke was hopeless. I also wasn't buying into all the Ellis love but both have been outstanding in the 2nd half of the season.

It's more a trust the manager, trust the players post. Too many times we as fans collectively write people off, well he's not good enough because in McPhee's case he was crpa before or Atieno was rubbish for Steveange so he's no good for us. It just doesn't work like that. Players change with different environments and different things expected of them. McPhee is now a central midfielder, he can play on the right or up front as a stop gap but his primary position now is central midfield. As a squad player needed here and there he's done fine for us.

Stevens again i never thought he could do it for 46 games a season like a lot of people but he's proved this season he can, again different manager different environment maybe different things expected of him on the pitch.

Ricey I doubt will be needed, but if he is I think Ling has earnt the right to be backed 100% on any decision he's made. Too many times he's made us me included eat our words.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by stevegull » 19 Mar 2012, 12:25

austrianandygull wrote:


I feel i must defend myself here. First of all i am not an expert and have never claimed to be, all i have is an opinion on what i see and that is good enough for me. I'm not one of these people who slags someone / thing off regardless. If they improve or show me they are better than i give them credit for then i will say so and hold my hands up.

Stevens first. Bixie and others know he is not my favourite player. I said he was too predictable and not equipped for league football. He hadn't improved or varied his game. Stevens has improved immeasurably this season and has been a great outlet for the team AND chipped in with goals. Going on what i'd seen of him the previous 4 seasons i was staggered that he was still being considered for first team football. I don't think my opinion of him before the season kicked off was unjustified. The fact is that he HAS improved this season and he HAS been a key player for us. IMO i think our style of play suits him in the fact that he always cuts inside and NEVER goes past a defender to whip crosses in. I don't believe he is capable of doing this if need be so essentially he has 'gotten away with it' however what he has done he has done admirably and i do believe he has the ability to be a league footballer.

McPhee is just McPhee. A tall ungainly striker who has a good record at conference level but is not good enough for us as even a back up. He did really well at Cheltenham and has done as the manager has asked as a pro but he is not good enough or us. Nothing against the bloke. I'm sure many of you will agree.

Tai has shown glimpses of quality but overall i have to say he is a fairly average back up striker. He shouldn't really be starting.

Who else? Morris? Morris is fine, not a problem with him.

I think fans have a right to dislike certain players and as long as it is done on a reasoned basis then fair enough. Not every player who has played for us has been competent.

I'm not saying that every squad member has not done well for us when called upon because they have, they are in there to do a job and they will do it as best they can. Doesn't mean they are any good and i think they are suddenly great. I'm not a hypocrite.
In fairness to Andy, i don't think anyone could have predicted Stevens change in form this year. We'd all seen him for long enough to know what he was about and I don't think anyone could genuinely say they were pleased when he was offered a new 2 year deal in the summer. As it turns out, he has improved dramatically this year and that 2 year deal is now looking like something of a masterstroke. Another Ling miracle!

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by AustrianAndyGull » 19 Mar 2012, 12:15

royalgull wrote:



I feel i must defend myself here. First of all i am not an expert and have never claimed to be, all i have is an opinion on what i see and that is good enough for me. I'm not one of these people who slags someone / thing off regardless. If they improve or show me they are better than i give them credit for then i will say so and hold my hands up.

Stevens first. Bixie and others know he is not my favourite player. I said he was too predictable and not equipped for league football. He hadn't improved or varied his game. Stevens has improved immeasurably this season and has been a great outlet for the team AND chipped in with goals. Going on what i'd seen of him the previous 4 seasons i was staggered that he was still being considered for first team football. I don't think my opinion of him before the season kicked off was unjustified. The fact is that he HAS improved this season and he HAS been a key player for us. IMO i think our style of play suits him in the fact that he always cuts inside and NEVER goes past a defender to whip crosses in. I don't believe he is capable of doing this if need be so essentially he has 'gotten away with it' however what he has done he has done admirably and i do believe he has the ability to be a league footballer.

McPhee is just McPhee. A tall ungainly striker who has a good record at conference level but is not good enough for us as even a back up. He did really well at Cheltenham and has done as the manager has asked as a pro but he is not good enough or us. Nothing against the bloke. I'm sure many of you will agree.

Tai has shown glimpses of quality but overall i have to say he is a fairly average back up striker. He shouldn't really be starting.

Who else? Morris? Morris is fine, not a problem with him.

I think fans have a right to dislike certain players and as long as it is done on a reasoned basis then fair enough. Not every player who has played for us has been competent.

I'm not saying that every squad member has not done well for us when called upon because they have, they are in there to do a job and they will do it as best they can. Doesn't mean they are any good and i think they are suddenly great. I'm not a hypocrite.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Richinns » 19 Mar 2012, 10:19

royalgull wrote:All through the season players have been missing and the experts on here have said the replacements are crap, not good enough etc. Stevens was first, then McPhee, then Atieno, then Morris, then Saah and everybody in the squad has stepped up at some point and done well for us. Bobby has been massive for us, you only have to look at Exeter to see what happens when you have a rubbish keeper and where we are to see what happens when you have a quality one. By all accounts he's fine and that's all that matters.

We don't want any disruption to the team right now but sometimes it can't be helped, like I said in the summer if Ricey is needed in the first team he won't let anyone down. In his only game at Cheltenham he was one of our better players on the night, what happens in reserve games when he's playing behing a bunch of kids in defense has no bearing on anything. Remember Ellis played when we lost 9 something at Cheltenham!!!

Bobby's our number 1 I agree with Ling he is by far the best in the elague probably the best in the bottom 2 leagues so if he was missing then we would absolutely miss him big time, anyone would and whoever comes in is a) going to be inferior and b) going to have huge boots to fill. But Ricey would deserve his chance just like everyone else in the side has done. I'm hoping it's not an issue this season now though because if we're going to go up we need no disruptions now especially not in goal.
Good point. Ricey has not had the chance to let anyone down in his second spell here so how can he be judged without this? Doubt he will be needed on Tuesday but if he is let’s give him our confidence as confidence this is very much attributed with form.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by bobby93 » 19 Mar 2012, 10:17

If we do that there's no point having him in the squad. There's no way Ling would treat a player like that, I'm sure of it.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by royalgull » 19 Mar 2012, 10:14

All through the season players have been missing and the experts on here have said the replacements are crap, not good enough etc. Stevens was first, then McPhee, then Atieno, then Morris, then Saah and everybody in the squad has stepped up at some point and done well for us. Bobby has been massive for us, you only have to look at Exeter to see what happens when you have a rubbish keeper and where we are to see what happens when you have a quality one. By all accounts he's fine and that's all that matters.

We don't want any disruption to the team right now but sometimes it can't be helped, like I said in the summer if Ricey is needed in the first team he won't let anyone down. In his only game at Cheltenham he was one of our better players on the night, what happens in reserve games when he's playing behing a bunch of kids in defense has no bearing on anything. Remember Ellis played when we lost 9 something at Cheltenham!!!

Bobby's our number 1 I agree with Ling he is by far the best in the elague probably the best in the bottom 2 leagues so if he was missing then we would absolutely miss him big time, anyone would and whoever comes in is a) going to be inferior and b) going to have huge boots to fill. But Ricey would deserve his chance just like everyone else in the side has done. I'm hoping it's not an issue this season now though because if we're going to go up we need no disruptions now especially not in goal.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Alpine Joe » 19 Mar 2012, 00:20

I would have imagined the whole point of Ricey training with our defence every day was that if Bobby did get injured he'd be able to step into that position causing the least disruption possible. Avoiding the problem of bringing someone new into the Club who the defence have never met before let alone try to adjust to each others ideas on defence.

Not playing Ricey would undermine the whole squad, especially those players who have trained hard in the belief that should there be an injury they'd be given their chance. On top of which it would mean we've vastly overpaid Ricey for providing some pre match warm ups & some reserve games. He's being paid as being capable of providing first team standard goalkeeping as & when required.

Personally I think that,for instance, taking a player as influential as Mansell out of the team & attempting to find a replacement for that kind of leadership (never mind the goals) would be a far more worrying task that having to replace Bobby with Martin Rice.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Gullscorer » 18 Mar 2012, 23:41

austrianandygull wrote:Although i would be extremely concerned should we lose Bobby to injury, i do believe that Ricey should be given an opportunity just like everyone else has under Ling. We all pretty much have come to the conclusion that Martin is a really honest and decent bloke so i don't think Ricey need worry. Like Ben says, he turns up every day and puts Bobby through his paces knowing there is virtually no chance of him getting a game. That must be hard for the lad and at least if he knows Ling has total faith in him and wouldn't stab him in the back by drafting another keeper in to play then it'll make each day a little more optimistic. It's all speculation anyway as Bobby will be fine. He is Austrian after all and built like a brick shithouse!
And one day he could be Governor of California..! =D

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by Dave » 18 Mar 2012, 22:49

Have to say totaly agree with Bengull, no need to panic Bobby.O is fit, think the article on the O/S was only taking about a scare during the game when he went down, but as said he got up and played on made a few saves including the penalty.

Whilst it is my view that a loss at Swindon would be no big deal, I think it is a game that the club will approach with confidence and belief they can win and why not our current form is no worse that Swindon's, and therefore the best 11 should play regardless.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by bengull » 18 Mar 2012, 21:06

Calm down bc-gull, are you Buckle in disguise? lol

I am all for Ricey being given his chance when Bobby is unavailable, but Bobby is fit and raring to go. There is absolutely no reason to suggest Swindon is a write off, we will be going there confident of winning, and we will play our best 11. Ricey was obviously told beginning of the season that if Bobby was fit, he wouldnt play a single minute of league action, harsh though that sounds, that is the reality.

Re: Keeper on loan.....

by bc-gull » 18 Mar 2012, 21:03

Theres a reason why our defence are playing so well at the moment.. its because of many things.. but a big factor is the team having full confidence on their keeper which in a way relieves pressure!

Now if Ricey comes in, suddenly they wont be so confident.. not cause hes worse(although he is) but more because of their game time etc. They wont have any confidence in him.. maybe the same if we had a keeper on loan. The best thing we could do is give Ricey his chance? Swindon would be a good game in a way. Everyone saying we can afford a slip up, so we could in turn afford to rest Bobby and see what our number 2 keeper can do?

Top