Why so negative?

Post a reply

Smilies
:goodpost: :lol: :rofl: :goal: :scarf: :keepie: :clap: :bow: :engflag: :-P :) :-D :nod: ;-) :-/ :( :'( :Z :@ :| :oops: :yellow: :red: :O :whistle: (*) (8) (D)

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Why so negative?

Re: Why so negative?

by Wisconsin_gull » 31 Dec 2012, 23:26

Scott - you beat me to the 'quote' :)

Yeoman starting will please Steve Breed no end - can barely wait to hear what he has to say on GullPlayer tomorrow, my money is on him being like a dog with two d**ks! :slap:

Re: Why so negative?

by Scott Brehaut » 31 Dec 2012, 23:22

In that same link Mr Ling also says :
Billy Bodin is no good *


Maybe he has been looking at this site

* In case anybody is about to get all keyboard warrior like - firstly get a bloody grip, it's nearly the new year, and secondly, I realise that I have taken what he has said out of context, but it wouldn't have been as funny otherwise.

Re: Why so negative?

by ferrarilover » 31 Dec 2012, 23:18

A-ha, not so fast, it seems that Mr Ling may have finally come to his senses in one small regard:

Yeoman is to start tomorrow against Wombles.

http://www.torquayunited.com/news/artic ... 70748.aspx

Matt.

Have refrained from any mention of Coley, he'll be back, of course, half term isn't far away.

Re: Why so negative?

by Dave_Pougher » 31 Dec 2012, 17:05

Have to say, I'm feeling a bit negative TQY wise at the mo. Just one look through other clubs websites shows how their loan and perm signings are shaping up already. Why then do I get the feeling our additions will add up to zero? Even the most frugal board member surely can see we now need a midfielder at the absolute minimum. Couple that with a striker that's needed, to increase attendances if nothing else, even if promotion is not in the sights. Struggle to see how after the performance against teams like Barnet and Argyle how we are ever going to mount a challange against Exeter City and the like. For the record I happen to think M. Ling is currently the best man for the job.

Re: Why so negative?

by Trojan 67 » 31 Dec 2012, 16:22

Does this mean that those who haven't posted for a while and who have been "offended" by so called "negative" posts by Austrianandygull and coley will now be back on here posting with enthusiastic venom ?


Oops, I mean vigour ?


:devil:

Re: Why so negative?

by coley in stripes » 31 Dec 2012, 10:32

Thanks again Dave, but on second thoughts, I have had enough (Obviously to the delight of certain posters). There are a few on here that want to discuss all opinions, but mainly I get too much abuse from a certain few.

Anyway, Happy New Year to the decent people on here...It's been fun...or has it

BYE

Re: Why so negative?

by coley in stripes » 31 Dec 2012, 10:24

Thanks Dave, I honestly believe that my posts have reasonable points but are usually answered with abuse, altough some have been constructive. As you could see, Andy has gone which is a loss for the site. If you think that I should also go, I will take your advice...Cheers

Re: Why so negative?

by Southampton Gull » 31 Dec 2012, 10:09

Coley, I think you took that well to be honest. I've just read the last couple of pages after being away all weekend.

If the thread descends into any more throwing of insults I'll lock it as it serves no purpose and just annoys a lot of the readers.

Re: Why so negative?

by coley in stripes » 31 Dec 2012, 10:04

Oh sorry, I forgot to mention 'Happy New Year'. Expect and look forward to many more insults appear to be quite popular :~D

Re: Why so negative?

by coley in stripes » 31 Dec 2012, 10:00

Nice intelligent post Farrarilover...You have just completely killed Kernogull's points and made his post look stupid.
I didn't expect support from you...Nice one !! By the way, without rereading my posts, I can confirm that none were non Torquay related and I have never told anybody to shut their mouth...You really need to read posts properly not just the first sentence.

Re: Why so negative?

by ferrarilover » 31 Dec 2012, 01:33

Masturbation no, washing up for pocket money yes.

Matt.

Re: Why so negative?

by Scott Brehaut » 30 Dec 2012, 21:25

ferrarilover wrote: Still, you keep plugging away, presumably between bouts of furious, fervent, teenage masturbation and doing the washing up to earn your pocket money.

Matt.
Are we supposed to stop once we hit our 20's? :O

Re: Why so negative?

by SuperNickyWroe » 30 Dec 2012, 17:45

ferrarilover wrote:Of your 72 posts, a quick read through reveals 12 not Torquay related, 12 neutral, 5 positive and a whopping 43 negative.
Given that you joined on April 14th 2012, and since then we have made the Playoffs, built the Bench, got the big screen, had the chance to watch players like Eunan and Bobby every week, I (and others) find it utterly staggering that, as someone who, presumably, has a great deal of homework to do during school holidays, you have managed to devote so much time to talking absolute nonsense on here.
Interestingly, you have also begged for people to go easy on you three times (once preemptively), told me to keep my mouth shut once (didn't really work out so well for you, that one) and been shown up as a right moron at least a dozen times.
Still, you keep plugging away, presumably between bouts of furious, fervent, teenage masturbation and doing the washing up to earn your pocket money.

Matt.

subtle as an airraid again matt.

well done. :Oops: =D

Re: Why so negative?

by ferrarilover » 30 Dec 2012, 17:43

Of your 72 posts, a quick read through reveals 12 not Torquay related, 12 neutral, 5 positive and a whopping 43 negative.
Given that you joined on April 14th 2012, and since then we have made the Playoffs, built the Bench, got the big screen, had the chance to watch players like Eunan and Bobby every week, I (and others) find it utterly staggering that, as someone who, presumably, has a great deal of homework to do during school holidays, you have managed to devote so much time to talking absolute nonsense on here.
Interestingly, you have also begged for people to go easy on you three times (once preemptively), told me to keep my mouth shut once (didn't really work out so well for you, that one) and been shown up as a right moron at least a dozen times.
Still, you keep plugging away, presumably between bouts of furious, fervent, teenage masturbation and doing the washing up to earn your pocket money.

Matt.

Re: Why so negative?

by coley in stripes » 30 Dec 2012, 14:08

Kernowgull wrote:Coley, the problem isnt negative opinions, the problem is that all the people who have negatives opinions get offended and aggressive if people dont agree with them.

If this is done to get a reaction, then really, get a life. If it actually upsets you that much then again, get a life!!
As mentioned, read my previous comments, not all negative but certainly not even a suggestion of being aggressive, rude, insulting or abusive.
Please don'e 'tar everyone with the same brush' so that you can streotype people that aren't always 'happy clappy'

Top