by Dave » 19 Feb 2013, 19:36
Guys leaving a club mutual consent does not in any mean he Paul Buckle quit the club of his own back, it means he was effectively sacked, but given the option to walk away clean and with his head held high, and he Paul Buckle took that option.
This does not surprise me one bit, after Luton beat Norwich the Luton chairman was interviewed and quite clearly said Luton's one, main and only priority was promotion back to the football league, it has become clear that they are to far behind to win the league and are slipping away from the play-off zone, so Luton clearly have decided a change was needed and "leaving the club by mutual consent" suited all parties.
As for him coming back here, it would be wrong to suggest Buckle fell out with all the board, but as one director said to me in person not long after he left "Buckle did us no favours" Would he be welcome, by the board maybe, by the fans in general, NO. Could be a bad move on our part and time is not on our side.
Guys leaving a club mutual consent does not in any mean he Paul Buckle quit the club of his own back, it means he was effectively sacked, but given the option to walk away clean and with his head held high, and he Paul Buckle took that option.
This does not surprise me one bit, after Luton beat Norwich the Luton chairman was interviewed and quite clearly said Luton's one, main and only priority was promotion back to the football league, it has become clear that they are to far behind to win the league and are slipping away from the play-off zone, so Luton clearly have decided a change was needed and "leaving the club by mutual consent" suited all parties.
As for him coming back here, it would be wrong to suggest Buckle fell out with all the board, but as one director said to me in person not long after he left "Buckle did us no favours" Would he be welcome, by the board maybe, by the fans in general, NO. Could be a bad move on our part and time is not on our side.