Jose Mourinho. Is he a good manager? Give him the transfer funds equivalent to the national debt of a middling African country and he will win you things but if he took over the reins at Plainmoor having only a kids piggy bank full of coppers to spend on players then would he get us up?
I've always found this debate interesting as IMO there are managers like Jose who can manage the big egos sure but they need cash to be successful and if he managed us or Mansfield or Grimsby then I have no doubt he wouldn't get anywhere. So is he a good manager then?
You also get managers like Neil Warnock for example or ones that get recycled in the Championship who can get teams out of that league into the Prem but when they get in the Prem and are given cash they fail. You get managers who excel on next to nothing budgets and who struggle when taking bigger jobs with more cash to spend.
I would have thought that if you were a good manager overall then you could fit in anywhere with any budget and do well but it now seems there are managers like Mourinho who flit from top club to top club and do well but wouldn't even contemplate a test at a league 2 club and there are managers like Gary Johnson at Yeovil for example who can achieve remarkable success on a shoestring but they hardly ever get the opportunites for the bigger jobs. When they do though they generally fail.
So do we accept that there are two 'breeds' of managers then?
Ones that need loads of cash to do well and ones that do well without loads of cash.
Interesting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff06/7ff067a58237d2f5fd05f6a1ee33b94aee04e802" alt="Shocked :O"