Wow! Way to go to get more support – insult anyone that disagrees with you. Supporters Direct are not just about Trust Ownership anyway – they are also about getting supporter “influence†onto boards – something I am in favour of.username2 wrote: Jayzuz HC, how dumb do you have to be?! Why don't you understand how Community Ownership works, BayGull? It doesn't mean the trust members chucking fivers into a bucket every week until their bank stops their overdraft. You have read the SD pages, haven't you? Oh, that's the problem - not enough brain cells to understand the concept.
Did you read this at the end of the WMN article: "“It would be awful if we’re sitting here in nine months’ time and the club has gone into administration and we as a community haven’t made any attempt."
Give me strength. Our club needs supporters now, not fans sticking their heads in the sand.
Talks on going with interested groups – so there IS interest out there.
I fully back the TUST. It’s a good thing to get influence on the way OUR club is run, and yes if worst come to the worst step in BUT if the choice is owner with TUST involvement or just the TUST I would go for the former.