wodger of awabia wrote:Someone like Carlton Cole could fit the bill IMO.
![LOL :lol:](./images/smilies/lol.gif)
wodger of awabia wrote:Someone like Carlton Cole could fit the bill IMO.
Chris B wrote:
Apologies if my reply seemed rude, I genuinely thought you were joking. Player-manager wouldn't be the way I'd go, but if we did go down that route it'd more likely be a lower league journeyman, or someone who has played most recently been in League 1 or 2. Gareth Ainsworth at Wycombe is one example of a successful appointment of that kind.wodger of awabia wrote:
Who would you suggest then? or don't you like player managers?
lol Not until I am certain he has gone!Southampton Gull wrote:
You can update your signature now Dave
Markh84 wrote:Could we even see the return of Martin Ling? I wouldn't be against that happening.
Jeff wrote:Very surprised by this news, and not totally sure what to make of it.
First and foremost it's a shame. For all he did for the club in his playing days, I wanted it to work out. But there were clearly huge problems last season. I felt that maybe given the chance to build a squad of his own fully - and without the deadwood left to him by Knill - he might have been able to do a better job. But clearly the board has seen that people were voting with their feet and something needed to change.
You have to assume that the board already have their own man to bring in, otherwise this is an outrageously risky strategy. A few weeks away from pre-season, with no signings, half a squad and no coaching staff. There must be someone waiting in the wings. I see Paul Cox has been mentioned - great credentials at this level but it's quite a leftfield shout. Someone is either absolutely in the know, or is just throwing names around. In our clubs position, you'd have thought that the cheaper, local, younger option would be the way they'd be going.
I think someone (Kernowgull?) made a great point on the first page. This could be a very shrewd way of getting rid. Rather than paying up a full years severance in one go, the board can jam spread it over the year, bonuses removed, until Greavsie et al find other employment. Could be a masterstroke. And it's good to see the new board making desicive action so soon.
One last thing from me - a vast number of people on here said they wouldn't go again whilst the current board were in situ. Well now you have a new board. Others said they wouldn't go whilst CH was still in charge. He's gone now too. I hope these people will now be good to their word and go back to Plainmoor and back the new regime 110%.
Because they knew they wouldn't accept the significance pay cut. Remember Hargreaves offering manse a significant pay cut last season, there was only one outcomerickl wrote:I must say that the new consortium doesn't waste time. But one thing I struggle to understand. If they have their own manager in the wings, why would they bother offering CH and the others a new deal with reduced wages. What if they had agreed to this deal? Then their man in the wings would be left hanging. m
Will be interesting to see who they appoint. Hopefully this will help bring people back in the stands.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests