There is, for the first time in a while, a huge number of well thought through posts in this thread. This one, however, takes the biscuit.Alpine Joe wrote:While in theory a new stadium might be capable of holding 6000, the Safety Advisory Group will be able to knock that down to 4000 in the blink of an eye. And if they're really determined 3500.
It will be important to start as we mean to go on, and telling the SAG where to stick their advice will be an important first step.
The SAG are a group of dangerous lunatics who believe in little more than 'fewer is safer'. Their arguments make even less sense than those of Brake, whose thinking extends no further than 'slower is safer'.
These people need putting in their box by those of us with more than two braincells available to us.
Good shout, Joe!
Matt.