Who to partner Atieno Saturday??.....
-
- On the Bench
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 17 Aug 2011, 15:51
- Favourite player: mansell
- Location: Where the sun shines......i wish !!!
even tho i cant spell his name lol
in vino veritas
fallaces sunt rerum species
fallaces sunt rerum species
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
usagullmichigan wrote: Hardly. As I am sure Fleetwood would of been within our quality range.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4c1d/e4c1d47f6e4e97117dbc4cb8be3331d8201307d7" alt="Angry :@"
It was more the suggestion that we... Oh forget it, its not worth the effort.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 10:06
- Location: Traverse City, Michigan
wow. Take some pills for that headache =D
-
- TorquayFans Admin
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 13:04
- Favourite player: Kevin Hill
- Location: Edinburgh
Atieno
O'Kane
Morris - Mansell - Lathrope - Macklin
Macklin gets a game on the right, Lathrope to help us move it about in the middle, and Eunan in a free role to float about and do the damage to them. Atieno on his own to chase everything.
O'Kane
Morris - Mansell - Lathrope - Macklin
Macklin gets a game on the right, Lathrope to help us move it about in the middle, and Eunan in a free role to float about and do the damage to them. Atieno on his own to chase everything.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
I agree with Gulli, O'Kane just behind Atieno, with the runs which Tai makes and Eunan playing those Championship quality balls through the defence would be magic.
Matt.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
See dinger is talking about three opitions including playing Macklin as a striker, any thoughts on that ?
Formerly known as forevertufc
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
Yeah, I'd be happy with this. He is a bit like a less hopeless Carayol. All speed but not vast amounts of end product. His crossing is a bit hit and miss. I love the idea of Macklers up top. If there is one thing in ANY division of ANY league in the world, it's pace. Macklin is frighteningly fast, like, seriously quick and we're told that, at full chat, Tai is even faster. That combo ought to terrorise a mediocre (unless they are vastly improved over last year) back line from Macclesfield.
Matt.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
Macklin had a little blast up front away at Cheltenham last season. Admittedly he was pretty sh*t, but then again last season he was pretty sh*t whatever position he played in.forevertufc wrote:See dinger is talking about three opitions including playing Macklin as a striker, any thoughts on that ?
Fair play to him, he seems to have upped his game over the summer and is finally realising some of the potential that had Chelsea sniffing around him a few years back.
Playing him upfront wouldnt be the worst call in the world, however he is by definition a winger so he should be given a run out in the league there first otherwise he's on a hiding to nothing unless he wins the match single-handedly. For me, it has to be McPhee up front otherwise I fear we'd upset the applecart too much.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 10009
- Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 19:52
- Favourite player: Kev Nicholson
- Location: Bikini Bottom
McPhee up top with Atieno for me. Not playing two up top in a home game is unacceptable, even if your replacement striker is shit.
Strangely enough it was Pope Gregory the 9th inviting me for drinks aboard his steam yacht, the saucy sue currently wintering in montego bay with the England cricket team and the Balanese Goddess of plenty.
-
- TorquayFans Admin
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 13:04
- Favourite player: Kevin Hill
- Location: Edinburgh
That's rubbish.austrianandygull wrote:McPhee up top with Atieno for me. Not playing two up top in a home game is unacceptable, even if your replacement striker is sh*t.
An attacking 4-5-1 is better than a defensive 4-4-2. The numbers on paper mean nothing - it's what happens on the pitch that matters.
If Macklin and Morris beat their full backs and we have O'Kane floating in front of their defence then we'll win. If we play well - we can win, if we don't - we won't. 4-5-1 at home isn't unacceptable at all if Mansell and Lathrope dominate the midfield and Atieno scores.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 10009
- Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 19:52
- Favourite player: Kev Nicholson
- Location: Bikini Bottom
Or Saah has another mare and we score twice but concede 3?
Strangely enough it was Pope Gregory the 9th inviting me for drinks aboard his steam yacht, the saucy sue currently wintering in montego bay with the England cricket team and the Balanese Goddess of plenty.
-
- TorquayFans Admin
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 13:04
- Favourite player: Kevin Hill
- Location: Edinburgh
Well that's a defensive issue. 4-5-1 is more defensive on paper than 4-4-2, but it depends on the personal.
Rafa Benitez (lost a bit of reputation in modern times), brought on Didi Hamann at half time, which made it more defensive on paper, but allowed the other midfielders (notably Gerrard) to attack more, and they came back from 3-0 to 3-3.
4-5-1 doesn't have to be defensive if we control the ball and use the wide players (plus O'Kane in the hole) to attack them.
I'd much rather we gave O'Kane more freedom than played McPhee or Macklin up front just to maintain a 4-4-2.
Rafa Benitez (lost a bit of reputation in modern times), brought on Didi Hamann at half time, which made it more defensive on paper, but allowed the other midfielders (notably Gerrard) to attack more, and they came back from 3-0 to 3-3.
4-5-1 doesn't have to be defensive if we control the ball and use the wide players (plus O'Kane in the hole) to attack them.
I'd much rather we gave O'Kane more freedom than played McPhee or Macklin up front just to maintain a 4-4-2.
I agree - play either McPhee or O'Kane off the front man - it is their more natural positions so more likely to get a result by playing players where they play best.Gulliball wrote: That's rubbish.
An attacking 4-5-1 is better than a defensive 4-4-2. The numbers on paper mean nothing - it's what happens on the pitch that matters.
If Macklin and Morris beat their full backs and we have O'Kane floating in front of their defence then we'll win. If we play well - we can win, if we don't - we won't. 4-5-1 at home isn't unacceptable at all if Mansell and Lathrope dominate the midfield and Atieno scores.
TUST member 328
Your club needs you. Join the TUST now - http://www.torquaysupporters.co.uk/
Your club needs you. Join the TUST now - http://www.torquaysupporters.co.uk/
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
Richinns wrote:
I agree - play either McPhee or O'Kane off the front man - it is their more natural positions so more likely to get a result by playing players where they play best.
That attitude will get you absolutely nowhere in football, sonny!
Sincerely,
Mr P Buckle, Bristol.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
ferrarilover wrote:
That attitude will get you absolutely nowhere in football, sonny!
Sincerely,
Mr P Buckle, Bristol.
P.S Try playing O'Kane at right-back. He could do a job, much like the 20 other non-right backs to fill the role.
Maybe one day, Carayol will find London...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Dutchgull, Keithsson, nawoo, Southampton Gull, westbaygull and 165 guests