You've misunderstood, Rooster my old Pedigree Chum. If you know what's up with Ling, then you can say without fear of falling foul of libel law. So, beans the spill, what's his major malfunction?rooster wrote: The problem you have is if its not true!, and I know for a fact it isn't
The problem with these forums is some people seem to make up what they feel and attribute it to someone, read back and you will see that I purely said that it was interesting reading. In relation to being unaware of the situation again you have conveniently put your slant on it, of course I am aware , what I was referring too was as I am new to this and wasn't aware of the ML thread so wasn't aware what had previously been discussed thats why I asked you where it was and then read it........simples, try and keep it real !SuperNickyWroe wrote:thing is matt, i pointed rooster in the direction of the martin ling thread.
and he said that after reading it he "understood."
dont know what he means now as it appeared yesterday that he was unaware of the "situation."
I shouldn't bother sharing info on here, I used to until I realized that they don't appreciate, respect or believe you even if you are stating fact! told them about KP and lots of other things in the past, before the event, and they still don't believe what I tell them so I now can't be arsed with them. especially the self anointed one, never wrong chap that enjoys abusing players and their families! read this quickly as it will probably be removed by the mods like lots of my posts seem to, just vanish due to so called moderation!rooster wrote: The problem with these forums is some people seem to make up what they feel and attribute it to someone, read back and you will see that I purely said that it was interesting reading. In relation to being unaware of the situation again you have conveniently put your slant on it, of course I am aware , what I was referring too was as I am new to this and wasn't aware of the ML thread so wasn't aware what had previously been discussed thats why I asked you where it was and then read it........simples, try and keep it real !
At the end of the day you seem like an individual that will believe what you want to so I am not going to change your mind and have no desire to really, just have my opinions and knowledge which I shared.................
rooster wrote:
The problem with these forums is some people seem to make up what they feel and attribute it to someone, read back and you will see that I purely said that it was interesting reading. In relation to being unaware of the situation again you have conveniently put your slant on it, of course I am aware , what I was referring too was as I am new to this and wasn't aware of the ML thread so wasn't aware what had previously been discussed thats why I asked you where it was and then read it........simples, try and keep it real !
At the end of the day you seem like an individual that will believe what you want to so I am not going to change your mind and have no desire to really, just have my opinions and knowledge which I shared.................
Southampton Gull wrote:
The problem isn't the forum. People should only take from them what they wish to, it's a discussion place frequented by people very different to each other with the common factor being the football team they choose to follow. Reactions are no different to those you would see in a pub or any other meeting place.
what ever, we will just have to believe you then! I have posted stuff fairly recently and it has gone next time I look, maybe you have a software fault that your unaware of or someone still has privileges that perhaps they shouldn't have, I don't know! all I know is that I have posted at least six things In the last two months that have failed to be there when I have come back to read responses to them! make of that as you will!Southampton Gull wrote:I've just been through the Moderator logs going back to the 13th May when you were allowed to join the forum. There are no entries showing any of your posts being removed apart from the one which I wrote to you about on 17th August. Your reply accepted the decision and you also thanked me for the explanation you were given.
Perhaps you would like to explain the last part of your post?
I panned the stupid bickering and got grief for it, wonder if that will happen to you!Southampton Gull wrote:No need to apologise, I just find it's the individuals responsibility to post in a manner acceptable to the majority, everyone crosses the line at some time or another but are then pretty quick to blame the forum when they find their views being targetted.
Matt takes a lot of stick on here but is probably insulted more times than anyone else but never complains, even when his account has been suspended he's never blamed the forum or the Mods. We try to let everyone have their say without getting involved but a few could do with a spell on the naughty step and might well find that becoming a reality very soon.
This thread could very well have been a good read if it wasn't for some of the stupid bickering.
Perhaps I was more polite about it and might receive a better response?geezer wrote: I panned the stupid bickering and got grief for it, wonder if that will happen to you!
Southampton Gull wrote:Are you sure that they were actually posted? Sometimes if you submit a post at the same time as someone else it doesn't get sent. We had a thread in the Admin Board about that recently. I found a few entries where posts show as being edited but the reasons given were to fix broken quotes. No evidence of posts being removed and I highly doubt the software hits a glitch every time you select the Submit button.
surely that is a software issue that needs attention then!Southampton Gull wrote: Perhaps I was more polite about it and might receive a better response?
This literally just happened to me because you posted at the same time.
Users browsing this forum: Vick and 38 guests
