Page 2 of 5

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 15:22
by lovinthatsurf
trouble is..your team came in waving their wads about at a time when our little team was facing its biggest challenge, you kinda raped us and left us in our own p!ss and sh!t, luckily we have managed to re build pretty dam quick and yes we are watching on with glee that it doesnt all seem to be coming up roses for you guys...

i cant see any problem with this!!!

ps still like you all better than the red Sh!te at the other end of Bristol!

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 15:25
by Awayday
Southampton Gull wrote:Says the single bloke living at home with mummy :clap:

See you tomorrow, gorgeous :@
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 15:53
by ferrarilover
I can do plenty about being single. You, however, will always be ugly.

Matt.

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 15:54
by Southampton Gull
ferrarilover wrote:I can do plenty about being single. You, however, will always be ugly.

Matt.

Yes, since gays were allowed to marry.........................

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 15:55
by ferrarilover
No BG, rather, you seem to be whinging about the content of the board, when we have this particular section specifically for this type of thread.
If you keep on throwing points down the drain like they're going out of fashion, the two boards will be idential anyway... both full of people calling Buckle a wanker. :~D

Matt.

Dave, hideous and not funny, poor, poor guy.

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 15:57
by Southampton Gull
Run to mummy for a comfort hug ;-)

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 16:15
by BritishGAS
ferrarilover wrote:No BG, rather, you seem to be whinging about the content of the board, when we have this particular section specifically for this type of thread.
If you keep on throwing points down the drain like they're going out of fashion, the two boards will be idential anyway... both full of people calling Buckle a wanker. :~D

Matt.

Dave, hideous and not funny, poor, poor guy.
Matt, I am not whinging whatsoever.

Obviously The Banter board is here for a reason.

You all think Buckle is a wanker, Great, but there is no need to start threads that are full of made up histrionics, just to try and make him look like he is an even bigger wanker(If that is actually possible for you guys) :~D

The points he made were not true, hence why I wrote my bit.

It just seems that Bristol Rovers are more important to him than Torquay United.

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 16:27
by Dave_Pougher
"Mr Pougher, It does seem very much so that you are obsessed with us." :rofl:

You've gotta laugh at that quote. That single quote must be the epiphany of pot kettle black cliche EVER ! coming from the man whos been posting on our boards for four months lol

but

It gets better

"Instead of writing utter durge about Bristol Rovers,"

OK I'm wrong, I accept it. Joe K is out of the side because him and Buckle are jolly good pals, perhaps more than that? Mustapha Caryol? Why thev'e always got along swimingly. Craig has a Saturday off because......he has note form his mum?..... or maybe he has somthing else on. You decide.

I'm interested in Rovers for two reasons. I live up here WSM and the most important one I really feel that you lot don't deserve this, he's out of his depth. I actually felt that when he was here. I was grateful you took him off our hands. It really was time for us to move on.Esp with the inevitable financial constraints we were to have this year. You have massives of untaped resources in your locality, football wise and City seem to be the ones to take advantage of that and that genuinely makes me sad. However you want to defend your club and I can understand that fully but he isn't the one to take you forward. He will get the odd result that will save his neck (think you'll probably have one comming Sat) but you won't move forward in line with your expectations until you've consigned this guy to history. He's a bad egg!

Rant over

PS

Have you paid your bet yet?

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 16:32
by usagullmichigan
Does Stanners have a missus. That could be the problem :lol:

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 16:55
by BritishGAS
Dave_Pougher wrote:"Mr Pougher, It does seem very much so that you are obsessed with us." :rofl:

You've gotta laugh at that quote. That single quote must be the epiphany of pot kettle black cliche EVER ! coming from the man whos been posting on our boards for four months lol

but

It gets better

"Instead of writing utter durge about Bristol Rovers,"

OK I'm wrong, I accept it. Joe K is out of the side because him and Buckle are jolly good pals, perhaps more than that? Mustapha Caryol? Why thev'e always got along swimingly. Craig has a Saturday off because......he has note form his mum?..... or maybe he has somthing else on. You decide.

I'm interested in Rovers for two reasons. I live up here WSM and the most important one I really feel that you lot don't deserve this, he's out of his depth. I actually felt that when he was here. I was grateful you took him off our hands. It really was time for us to move on.Esp with the inevitable financial constraints we were to have this year. You have massives of untaped resources in your locality, football wise and City seem to be the ones to take advantage of that and that genuinely makes me sad. However you want to defend your club and I can understand that fully but he isn't the one to take you forward. He will get the odd result that will save his neck (think you'll probably have one comming Sat) but you won't move forward in line with your expectations until you've consigned this guy to history. He's a bad egg!

Rant over

PS

Have you paid your bet yet?
Dave I have been posting on your board for 4 months correct, I actually enjoy this forum,but I dont start threads about Torquay United and I dont comment on threads regarding Torquay United. All I do is comment on threads and posts regarding my club, which are posted by Torquay fans.

Joker4 is out of the side because he refused to play for us, stating his head was not right to play. He wants to bugger off back to London and does not want to be at Bristol Rovers. The club offered him to clubs in the transfer window but he refused to move because the clubs wanting him were not in London. The club do not want players who dont want to be here, Buckles stance is the correct one. It is not alienating Joker4, he has made his bed, now he needs to lie in it.

I dont know the history between Buckle and Carayol, I am sure you can enlighten me? But there has been no falling out between the pair here, I can vouch for that.

Craig Stanley has a weekend off, probably because he has been shit and doesn't deserve his place in the side and has been dropped. It is up to him to prove his worth and get back to being something like a professional footballer. Nothing wrong with that in my eyes.

Paul Buckle may be out of his depth, I have mentioned before that the jury is very much still out on him from sections of our fan base, We will see in time whether he was the right appointment or not.

You are right, we are vastly underachieving as a football club, the City of Bristol as a whole is underachieving. You can look at Bristol City and say they are way ahead of us at the moment but that is only because of the fortunes of one man that has propelled them to be where they are. We do have huge potential as a football club, in terms of fan base and catchment area, once The UWE gets built we can go someway to being where, as fans and as a club feel we should be. I think Buckle's aim is to get us out of this division at the first time of asking, If he doesn't then our support will surely come down on him, but like I have said he needs time with so many new players, whether he gets that is another question.

I am passionate about Bristol Rovers and I want to defend them at every opportunity, when I see stuff written about them that is incorrect I just want to put my point across.

And yes Dave has recieved my cheque and he will be handing it over to your trust at tomorrows game :-D

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 17:52
by ferrarilover
'ere Dave, we best make BG a mod so he enforce all these rules he seems to have about what threads we can and can't start.

Matt.

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 18:17
by Southampton Gull
ferrarilover wrote:'ere Dave, we best make BG a mod so he enforce all these rules he seems to have about what threads we can and can't start.

Matt.

I was thinking about giving him your slot ;-)

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 18:43
by Dave
Read this thread so i thought i know, i will go and read the Rovers main forum and there alternative forum, yes i am a member of both.

Stand up and to take a bow Buckle, it has taken you just 4 month's , yes 4 short month's to lose the trust of a large % of the Rovers fan base well done, P45 in the post :clap: :)

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 20:48
by ferrarilover
Southampton Gull wrote:
I was thinking about giving him one ;-)
I love watching that kind of filth. :devil:

Re: Craig Stanley

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 20:50
by Southampton Gull
ferrarilover wrote: I love watching that kind of filth. :devil:

Most men of a certain age still living with their mother enjoy the same hobby ;-)