Page 2 of 2
Re: New deal for yeoman
Posted: 22 May 2012, 16:21
by stevegull
ferrarilover wrote:As opposed to keeping it busy with a joke so ancient, it's mentioned in the Old Testament... :devil:
Matt.
Grammar Nazis/religious extremists - is the capitalisation of 'Old' in Old Testament necessary?
Fair enough!
For what it's worth, I think the capitalisation is necessary.
Re: New deal for yeoman
Posted: 22 May 2012, 19:05
by happytorq
ferrarilover wrote:As opposed to keeping it busy with a joke so ancient, it's mentioned in the Old Testament... :devil:
Matt.
Grammar Nazis/religious extremists - is the capitalisation of 'Old' in Old Testament necessary?
Absolutely. It's a proper noun.
Re: New deal for yeoman
Posted: 22 May 2012, 23:47
by ferrarilover
Thanks, I was pretty sure it was required, but silly law do things differently to everyone else, and it's beginning to confuse me.
Matt.
Re: New deal for yeoman
Posted: 23 May 2012, 20:14
by CP Gull
New deal signed and sealed.
Now it's time for young Ashley to "put up or shut up" ..... in the words of the great man himself!
Re: New deal for yeoman
Posted: 24 May 2012, 08:21
by clemy1989
good luck ash! hope he fulfills the potential shown in the reserve and youth teams. get him on the 7 man bench few sub appearences maybe start him in the jpt