Jerry wrote:That's what we've been missing at Plainmoor: a bloke with a chainsaw chopping up a giant log!
The problem with US "soccer", and indeed all American sports, is the "closed shop" nature of it. In your experience do they understand the concept of promotion and relegation and would they consider implementing it?
Timber Joey is a Portland celebrity (seriously, he has players asking for pictures with him). Every time Portland scores, he takes the chainsaw to the log and it gets passed around the crowd and later, presented to the goalscorer. I, for one, think this is awesome.
MLS being a 'closed shop' is interesting. I actually don't think it is necessarily a bad thing - the culture is very different to in Europe, and you have to remember that each club has paid $40M (at least - it's expected the Cosmos will be asked for $100M) for the right to play in MLS. Not having relegation is vital, then, because why would you spend that cash when there's a chance you could play in division 2.
Then, the structure of football outside MLS is always changing - because it doesn't have the financial support there are various leagues claiming to be the second division. Also, the simple fact that the country is so huge works against them - taking at least 25 people from California to the East coast would cost a fortune, and that's something clubs simply can't afford to do. Can you imagine if Torquay had to fly to Prague 5 or 6 times a season to play? We'd go skint in months.
There are quite a few people who fervently believe that promotion and relegation is important but to be honest, I don't think it'll ever happen; nor do I think it needs to. Eventually I can see MLS expanding to at least 24 clubs, and the play-off system (which I seriously doubt will ever disappear) gives them the end of season party that American sports need to have. It's all very well saying that "it should be a single table and the team with the most points wins" but that's not what Americans are used to, and it wouldn't work. It also makes it unlikely that a single team is going to dominate in the way that Man U or Barcelona can do - another plus for me.
MLS is slightly different to most of the sports here; it's not like NFL or NHL where they are the only league worth playing in. If players want more money, they can just move to Europe (assuming any team in Europe wants them). There is a pretty small salary cap which is designed to make sure that clubs aren't putting themselves in financial danger. The cap is only $2.675M this year, which explains why some players are on $25k a year! (the 'star' players are called designated players and only about $335k of their salary is included in the salary cap - the rest has to get paid by the club itself. I think it's fairly obvious that the cap needs to be improved, and it will - it goes up every year and actually they've been pretty smart by not overextending too soon. This is only the 16th season, after all.
(I realise I've gone on, but I'm a fan.)
Not everything is perfect - I don't like that MLS teams cram friendlies against European teams in the middle of the season and I think it's poor that MLS carries on during the World Cup and Gold Cup (CONCACAF's continental championship, which happens every two years) - it can mean that the better teams lose have their team at a critical time. But the game here is growing, and despite some of the (valid) criticism levelled at it, I think they've given themselves a platform to ensure that the league lasts a hundred years.
They've already drawn level with NASL (of Cosmos 'fame') - that league ran from 1968-1984 - and they've done that by making efforts not to repeat the mistakes that league made.
Chris.