sonofwod wrote:I don't think it does any harm for Howe to have to fight to get his place back. He got himself sent off for a stupid tackle, he's missed 4 games and his replacement has done nothing wrong, with the team hitting some great form. There's no question he's the better footballer, but he's also the more rash of the two. Let him learn his lesson on the bench and let Atieno be rewarded for his part in recent success.
First of all I'll caveat that what I am going to say is mainly from the basis of listening to games on the radio and highlights - the two games I've seen were the Sheff Utd game on a stream and Hereford at my only game of the season so far...
I've actually been surprised by the lack of rashness from Howe - he generally seems to play with a smile on his face and doesn't seem to get wound up easily. I'm not sure how much the sending off was a rush of blood or simply just a very badly timed tackle.
There is no doubt that of the two Howe is the better player - a composed finisher and for a big man very good with his feet (in fact he is probably weakest in the air). However, I wonder whether, especially away from home, Atieno actually adds slightly more to the overall team play. Howe, while quicker than he looks like he should be, does not have the genuine pace that Atieno does. Atieno is strong enough to look after himself as a lone striker and I think combined with the pace he has he forces opposition defences to play deeper and so actually allowing O'Kane, Morris and Stevens to push further on and have a little more room to play. I think Atieno also pressures defences/keepers slightly more.
One other thing that was noticeable about Howe in both the games I've seen - he comes both deep and wide to win the ball but once he has done his job he doesn't get into the box quick enough - he seems to like staying involved in the play (which he is good at) and not make his presence felt in the box.
Just my two pence worth anyway - a regular attendee may point out it is all rubbish!