International evening

[usagullmichigan]

Le God agrees with me and Chris

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... s-act.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Southampton Gull]

That just puts you both in the same looney bin

[Glostergull]

I was mildly impressed with England under Pearce.

However, there do seem to be a group of doom-dwellers for England that can only see the negatives, particularly on the BBC blogs!

Some people on there were actually complaining about Cahill scoring that goal, because apparently it showed tactical ineptness (is that a word? Sure...). I have, and many people have, longed for an England side that shows some inginuity and creativity. I would much prefer us to lose 4-3 and shows some flair and to want to win the game, than meandering our way to a 1-0 defeat. There were signs of some returning creativity and flair, and for that i applaud Pearce.

Oh really. Come on, you follow Torquay United. You should have seen the doom dwellers on here. Every team has em
And As for ineptness. Well if one can be called inept for scoring a goal then we really do have problems. I thought that was the whole idea of the game. Or is actauly to see whether you be nominated for an oscar for feining injury or having a go at the ref. I would ignore em. They ain't worth the air time

[stevegull]

Oh really. Come on, you follow Torquay United. You should have seen the doom dwellers on here. Every team has em
And As for ineptness. Well if one can be called inept for scoring a goal then we really do have problems. I thought that was the whole idea of the game. Or is actauly to see whether you be nominated for an oscar for feining injury or having a go at the ref. I would ignore em. They ain't worth the air time