As always a realistic and honest response from KN. But weren't we supposed to be the fittest side in the league this season? To be knackered after 45 minutes in the 10th game of the season would suggest otherwise.Gullscorer wrote:I suppose, after those recent improved performances, that we should have half-expected a performance like that yesterday. Kevin Nicholson's analysis was spot on, and we should have faith in him to deal with the problem. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37360102
Yes the squad is lightweight in a few areas, and a senior player or two with experience would benefit the squad considerably. However, such players come a little bit more expensive, and would probably be more than the budget could cover right now.
Besides which, the second half of the season, when we'll have a clearer picture of the situation regarding injuries and suspensions and of where it's necessary to strengthen the side, along with the availability of loanees, will be the time to bring players in for the home run.
In the meantime, carry on with the coaching, training and fitness regimes, and continue the contributions to the Players Fund..
Woking v Torquay Tuesday 13 Septamber 2016 (k.o.7:45 pm)
-
- Plays for Country
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 21:13
- Favourite player: Chris Myers
- Location: Wigan
Lucy
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: 19 Feb 2011, 08:48
- Favourite player: Robin Stubbs
- Watches from: Family Stand
We were second best all night and lucky to be ahead at half-time. Would like to know the reason Ward was subbed at the interval.
Our players fit? No way compared with part-time Woking.
We could easily have lost that with a far heavier scoreline.
What the manager hasn't said is that he got the tactics wrong. I maintain the players didn't lose to Lincoln nor to Woking but the manager's novice knowledge did.
Our players fit? No way compared with part-time Woking.
We could easily have lost that with a far heavier scoreline.
What the manager hasn't said is that he got the tactics wrong. I maintain the players didn't lose to Lincoln nor to Woking but the manager's novice knowledge did.
...... and didn't I hear the commentator on more than one occasion say something like 'their striker, Rowe-Turner, looks a dangerous player', presumably meaning their double barrel named player, Sam-Yorke.torq2u wrote: I swapped over from Radio Devon because the commentator was spouting such inane things (eg 10 minutes into the game, saying about the journey home being so much fun after a win) (!) and he could not get GG's name right. It is NOT Jellfiaco. OK Call me Mr Picky.
![Hmm :-/](./images/smilies/arf.gif)
About as sh*t as I remember it. Can see why Moore wasn't happy with the first goal though - I'd say that was a pretty clear handball. Not saying it changed the result or anything as we were poor, but thats the sort of break we don't seem to get
what a massive miss by the officials for their first goal!
Correct it may not have changed the result but we conceded at a poor time of the half, the longer it stayed 1-0 the more likely we could have held out!
Correct it may not have changed the result but we conceded at a poor time of the half, the longer it stayed 1-0 the more likely we could have held out!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests