Ling v Buckle

Dave_Pougher · Post by **Dave_Pougher** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:04

Modgull wrote:2-5 ft ho ho

What ever the arguments for against Buckle/Ling we can't get away from the fact that what Rovers are going through now that could have been us had he stayed!

Gees God.

Thank you Paul !

divingbboy · Post by **divingbboy** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:06

Oh, well, Paul. I'm sure there must be a couple of Conference South teams looking for a young and ambitious manager such as yourself.

Neal · Post by **Neal** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:09

If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

Plymouth Gull · Post by **Plymouth Gull** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:10

Dave_Pougher wrote:
What ever the arguments for against Buckle/Ling we can't get away from the fact that what Rovers are going through now that could have been us had he stayed!

Gees God.

Thank you Paul !

Difficult to say that. Had he stayed, Branston would be here, Stanley, Zebs, probably Robinson & Tomlin would be here. What positions they'd be playing in though is anyones guess!

stevegull · Post by **stevegull** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:26

NickGull wrote: Difficult to say that. Had he stayed, Branston would be here, Stanley, Zebs, probably Robinson & Tomlin would be here. What positions they'd be playing in though is anyones guess!

Now that's not fair. Branston could do a decent job on the right wing!

Post by **Dave** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:32

and Tomlin could have played in goal, iam sure

Burnhamgull · Post by **Burnhamgull** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:44

Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

Are you kidding? Funniest thing on the web tonight

Modgull · Post by **Modgull** » 31 Dec 2011, 17:45

Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

Yes, just spent a happy half hour reading all the comments about PB and his team!

Neal · Post by **Neal** » 31 Dec 2011, 18:04

hahaha me too I cant keep away, its so amusing!

Neal · Post by **Neal** » 31 Dec 2011, 18:16

mmmmm.... they dont want anymore Torquay rejects it seems, Leroy was at the game

Modgull · Post by **Modgull** » 01 Jan 2012, 09:03

Neal wrote:mmmmm.... they dont want anymore Torquay rejects it seems, Leroy was at the game

I guess that puts paid to the "Robbo to Rovers in the transfer window" thread

Dave_Pougher · Post by **Dave_Pougher** » 01 Jan 2012, 09:45

Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull

â™ª â™« â™ª â™«
Don't post if you cant be nice
Don't post if you cant be nice

lol

Neal · Post by **Neal** » 01 Jan 2012, 10:53

Mmmmm.... not so sure now, looks like Buckle is staying and has the go ahead to get 3 or 4 new players including 2 CB's, like urgently. The fans dont want any more Torquay rejects, but will Buckle worry about that, mmmmm... doubt it.

I reckon Buckle will try and come here as he knows we are an easy touch and we have 3 good CB's.

This saga could continue guys.

wodger of awabia · Post by **wodger of awabia** » 01 Jan 2012, 13:00

brucie wrote:One talks total cockney

The other is a total c**k

Yes, & is excused for his "verbial kitchen sink" comment!

:~D

wodger of awabia · Post by **wodger of awabia** » 01 Jan 2012, 13:06

forevertufc wrote:and Tomlin could have played in goal, iam sure

No, I believe that he had Danny pencilled in for that job!

Torquay United Fans Forum

Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Re: Ling v Buckle

Who is online

Login • Register