Who's in control?

[Stickingitin]

Who's in control?
Before the first ball was kicked Gary Johnson eluded to having loan players coming in.
We're at our third game and no sign of any extra loan players.
If GJ knew he needed loan players then he would of brought them in at that time as it was the best time, as at that time we were touted to be one of the favourites.
Two games gone and the picture seems to be coming clearer.
Either something or someone is constraining GJ and his team (Look at last season, it's repeating) or GJ and his team have no clue.
The fact that Gary and his teams have taken this championship before can only elude to what is actually happening.

[Stickingitin]

I will say (so as to further this topic), as much of this forum is aware of the term 'Veni, vidi, vici'.
You see whence the perpetrators of cunning divide the fan they have more reasons to further the plan.

I introduce a different version of Pascal's Wager
The wager uses the following logic:
TUFC is, or TUFC is not. Reason cannot decide between the two alternatives
A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up
You must wager (it is not optional)
Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that TUFC is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing
Wager, then, without hesitation that TQ1 is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy club to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.
But some cannot believe. They should then 'at least learn your inability to believe...' and 'Endeavour then to convince' themselves.

[SuperNickyWroe]

Well, thanks for that, that's a great weight off my mind....
Whatever it means....

[North Curry House]

I will say (so as to further this topic), as much of this forum is aware of the term 'Veni, vidi, vici'.
You see whence the perpetrators of cunning divide the fan they have more reasons to further the plan.

I introduce a different version of Pascal's Wager
The wager uses the following logic:
TUFC is, or TUFC is not. Reason cannot decide between the two alternatives
A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up
You must wager (it is not optional)
Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that TUFC is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing
Wager, then, without hesitation that TQ1 is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy club to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.
But some cannot believe. They should then 'at least learn your inability to believe...' and 'Endeavour then to convince' themselves.

What a total toss pot.

[Stickingitin]

Well, thanks for that, that's a great weight off my mind....
Whatever it means....

It does take some thought.
Reason and deduction is the main thinking and using different time scales can show what is happening.
It's basically showing the owners the door and for the fans to stick behind the team AND the management in place.
Believe that or not but the facts state that GJ and whatever management team have won many championships, whereas the owners do not have such a good record.
Maybe it's time they really put their faith in GJ and team.

[Stickingitin]

What a total toss pot.

I love you too.

[Stickingitin]

Well, thanks for that, that's a great weight off my mind....
Whatever it means....

It also is stating the club is more important than the owners.

[Stickingitin]

There is a way to do statistical analysis where you will always win more than you lose, how this pertains to football is as easy as 123.
The secret is timing and position of timing in sets that one cannot fathom.
Of course it's more in depth than that summary but all reveals itself when the cogs fit.
Maybe TQ1 could do with someone like me, who knows?

[happytorq]

It does take some thought.

So does knowing the difference between "elude" and "allude".

it can sometime elude some people...

[Stickingitin]

So does knowing the difference between "elude" and "allude".

it can sometime elude some people...

It can work on grammar too. As my teachers always said "could do better". Thanks happytorq.
Did you name your forum name after the Happy Ending Theorem?

[SuperNickyWroe]

It can work on grammar too. As my teachers always said "could do better". Thanks happytorq.
Did you name your forum name after the Happy Ending Theorem?

No, the Captain Sensible song.....

[Stickingitin]

No, the Captain Sensible song.....

Should be sung every game

[Stickingitin]

torque (n.)
"rotating force," 1882, from Latin torquere "to twist, turn, turn about, twist awry, distort, torture," from PIE *torkw-eyo-, causative of root *terkw- "to twist." The word also is used (since 1834) by antiquarians and others as a term for the twisted metal necklace worn anciently by Gauls, Britons, Germans, etc., from Latin torques "collar of twisted metal," from torquere. Earlier it had been called in English torques (1690s). Torque-wrench is from 1941.
Happy Torque Torque Happy Torq, talk about force and twist and turn

[Southampton Gull]

So does knowing the difference between "elude" and "allude".

it can sometime elude some people...

Punctuation also eludes some people!

[greb46]

For an illiterate like myself,never knew I could learn so much on a football forum!