Page 1 of 3
time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 16:11
by baldy
just putting the question out there
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 16:14
by royalgull
a change in results would be very nice agreed.
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 16:30
by Dave_Pougher
Change in what? If you mean management then no.
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 18:39
by SuperNickyWroe
yeah it is.
get Super back in midfield!

Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 18:47
by westbaygull
No...
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 18:48
by yellow
Change in results?
Yes please. 8 games without a win and 4 points out of 24 is relegation form, no matter how promising some periods of those games have been...
2-0 and we fecked it up is becoming far too prevalent thanks to our ability to shoot ourselves in the foot and let teams back into games that we should be closing out.
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 19:03
by SuperNickyWroe
westbaygull wrote:No...
spoilsport jane.....

Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 19:07
by westbaygull
SuperNickyWroe wrote:spoilsport jane.....

Think I need to get out the smelling salts - I have had positive thoughts about Bucks AND Zebs today

Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 19:12
by SuperNickyWroe
westbaygull wrote:
Think I need to get out the smelling salts - I have had positive thoughts about Bucks AND Zebs today

as long as they are
only positive thoughts Jane......
i mean, what would the jesus/yeti/pikey say...................

he'd be well jealous!

Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 20:30
by Colorado Gull
Results, CM and a forward that is strong and can score.......please!?
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 20:32
by HRG
wouldn't change Bucks, no but something is amiss. What happened to our defence????
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 21:12
by Yellow4life
Would change Branston, Robbo CB, Mansell RB and oastler CM with O'kane.
The rest can't really change except possibly Macklin for Stevens which won't happen.
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 22:06
by Dave
I think this is a fair and relevant question to ask.The answer.....no.
I think the current run of results is not the fault of Buckle,look at the number of times we have hit the post, stevenage,shrewsbury etc,home to aldershot thought we were the better team and should have won,today deserved a point,and credit bury to me the best attacking side we have seen so far this season,apart from macc home the team have been playing quite well,and could easily had atleast 5 more points if not more from this run.
Also take into account the playing budget was allready small before it was cut,Buckle largly has his hands tied,and even if we could afford the better players,it is not that easy to attract them to come and play for TUFC.
All in all in think Buckle is doing a good job,and who else could the club attract as manager on our playing budget location etc,who would or could do a better job.
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 22:27
by Yellow4life
I haven't seen oastler play yet but he look physical(albeit watching him in the warm up!) I said Mansell RB simply as we have no one else available unless we give LRT a go? Charnock and Branston just don't do it for me at the moment.
We do need a new striker and midfielder though, send gritton back!!
Re: time for a change??
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 23:48
by Fletch
Yellow4life wrote:I said Mansell RB simply as we have no one else available unless we give LRT a go?
Is Senda still here?