I read on the BBC yesterday that for these proposals to get off the ground they must be approved by:
75% of Premier League clubs AND
75% of Football League Clubs INCLUDING at least 75% of clubs in the Championship.
That's screwed that then!
FA proposing League Structure changes
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 18:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
DTG wrote:I don't see why you'd presume that a side with a home attendance of, say, 4000 would fail to raise a single away supporter. Hyde FC, who get about 400 at home were still taking a minibus full to away games last year and that's to watch a side which managed 10 points all year.
I think a number of people would see it as a cheap way to follow their team without having to stump up for an expensive first team ticket. Once teams are established, the away following would follow pretty naturally. Ok, Stoke B might not bring many, but then, I doubt that we'll be seeing the away end opened for Halifax or Dover FC next season either.
For some sort of evidence of success of brand new teams with an attachment to an existing PL giant (I know the circumstances are somewhat different), have a look at FCUM, FC United of Manchester. Alright, they started off as a protest vote, but the initial excitement of it being something new has long since passed (remember the Ebbsfeet thing, 25,000 supporters in year one, about 600 in year two once the initial gloss of "owning shares in a football club" wore off) and they still get anywhere between 3 and 6 times the gates of everyone else. I can't find their away figures, but there's talk on the website of offering coach travel, except where demand fails to suffice (so the presumption is that a coach will run. That's the same situation as at Torquay). This is in the Evo-Stik, which is so far down the pyramid that I'm not even sure how far down they really are.
I think there are still, just, enough genuine football fans left at the top of the pyramid that away attendances would be comparable with the Conference. On that score, the argument against looks extremely weak. Elsewhere, it's stronger, and it's in those areas that any sensible objection to the proposals should be concentrated.
Matt.
I am loving the irony of FL jacking off all enthusiastic about the B Team league and its promotion yet refuses to want or even acknowledge the sense of Marketing TUFC. Matt, dear boy, stick to carrying papers for other jumped up, self important chinless wonders.[/quote]
No one's this stupid. Not in real life.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: 29 Oct 2010, 17:50
- Favourite player: Lee Mansell
Looks like its going to be rightly dismissed by FL clubs
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27743046
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27743046
TUFC FACEBOOK PAGE - https://www.facebook.com/insideplainmoor
TUFC TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/TUFC1899
Torquay United Supporters Trust member - Join the TUST now!
TUFC TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/TUFC1899
Torquay United Supporters Trust member - Join the TUST now!
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: 13 Jun 2011, 14:09
- Favourite player: Mark Loram
[quote="PlainmoorRoar"]Looks like its going to be rightly dismissed by FL clubs
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27743046/quote
Really glad to hear that. Time for Greg Dyke to resign and leave football alone. Dyke is a prat, I would say wa**er but that is rude.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27743046/quote
Really glad to hear that. Time for Greg Dyke to resign and leave football alone. Dyke is a prat, I would say wa**er but that is rude.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: MellowYellow and 158 guests