wivelgull wrote:But where is the EVIDENCE that the new owners are going to 'dispose' of our club?
I remember, Wivel, many years ago, you used to refer to the concept of learning from history and history is all we have to go on, so far, when judging the intent of GI.
They may not yet be evidence that they have malevolent intentions regarding TUFC but neither is there any evidence that their intentions are benevolent, other than a fluffy interview with David Thomas, who judging by his podcast seems convinced, but then it is much easier for him to pretend everything is ok, rather than have to actually do some journalistic digging.
For GI it is likely that TUFC are a means to end to making profit somewhere along the line. Decisions are likely to be made in terms of the impact it has on GI rather than TUFC. If it suits GI to close the club then they will. If it suits GI to invest in the club, then they will. However, the concerns of TUFC are always likely to play second fiddle to the concerns of GI. Is that something long-term we really want?